SharecareApplication · Echobh

CVE-2021-36123

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-07-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Echo ShareCare 8.15.5. The TextReader feature in General/TextReader/TextReader.cfm is susceptible to a local file inclusion vulnerability when processing remote input in the textFile parameter from an authenticated user, leading to the ability to read arbitrary files on the server filesystems as well any files accessible via Universal Naming Convention (UNC) paths.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Echo ShareCare 8.15.5 contains a local file inclusion vulnerability in the TextReader feature (General/TextReader/TextReader.cfm). The vulnerable textFile parameter accepts unsanitized user input, allowing authenticated attackers to traverse directory paths and read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. The vulnerability also supports Universal Naming Convention (UNC) path access, potentially exposing network-adjacent file resources.

MitigationImplement strict input validation and whitelisting for the textFile parameter to restrict file access to intended directories only. Consider using ColdFusion's DirectoryExists() and FileExists() functions with validated paths, and disable UNC path support if not required for business functionality.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SharecareApplication
Affected:= 8.15.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Echo ShareCare version
    Check the application installation directory or product information to verify the exact version number matches 8.15.5. Look for version files, about pages, or administrative interfaces that display the product version.
    Affected if The installed version is Echo ShareCare 8.15.5 exactly
  2. Verify TextReader.cfm exists
    Locate the file General/TextReader/TextReader.cfm within the web application root directory. Use file system inspection or directory listing to confirm its presence.
    Affected if The vulnerable file TextReader.cfm exists in the application directory
  3. Confirm textFile parameter is accessible
    Review the TextReader.cfm source code to verify it accepts a textFile parameter. Check if the parameter is processed without sanitization or validation.
    Affected if The textFile parameter is present and accepts user input without validation
  4. Check authentication requirements
    Determine whether the TextReader feature is accessible to authenticated users. Review access controls or session requirements for this endpoint.
    Affected if The TextReader feature is accessible to authenticated users without additional restrictions
  5. Test for path traversal access
    If you have authorized access, send a request to TextReader.cfm with a textFile parameter containing path traversal sequences (e.g., ../../) to verify if arbitrary files can be accessed.
    Affected if The application allows path traversal and returns contents of files outside the intended directory

The environment is affected if Echo ShareCare version 8.15.5 is running and the TextReader feature (General/TextReader/TextReader.cfm) is accessible to authenticated users without proper input validation on the textFile parameter.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation and whitelisting for the textFile parameter to restrict file access to intended directories only. Consider using ColdFusion's DirectoryExists() and FileExists() functions with validated paths, and disable UNC path support if not required for business functionality.

Fix this in Sharecare Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-36123 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-36123 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data