and stealing cookies .","url":"https://dbcve.org/cve/CVE-2021-36720","datePublished":"2021-12-08T20:15:07Z","dateModified":"2026-06-17T03:59:02Z","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"dbcve.org"}}
Mail SecureApplication · Pineapp

CVE-2021-36720

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-12-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.2.1 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
PineApp - Mail Secure - Attacker sending a request to :/blocking.php?url=<script>alert(1)</script> and stealing cookies .

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in PineApp Mail Secure's /blocking.php endpoint. The 'url' parameter accepts unsanitized user input which is reflected back in the response, allowing injection of malicious JavaScript (<script>alert(1)</script>) to execute in victim browsers and steal session cookies.

MitigationImplement proper input validation and output encoding for the url parameter in blocking.php. Use allowlist validation for expected URL formats and apply context-appropriate escaping before rendering any user-supplied data in HTML output.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mail SecureApplication
Affected:< 5.2.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm PineApp Mail Secure is installed
    Locate PineApp Mail Secure installation directory or check for the product via system inventory, package manager, or web server configuration files that reference PineApp.
    Affected if PineApp Mail Secure is present in the environment
  2. Identify installed version
    Check version information from PineApp Mail Secure installation, typically found in version files, admin interface, or product metadata.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 5.2.1
  3. Verify blocking.php endpoint exists
    Check if /blocking.php exists in the web root or accessible paths of the PineApp Mail Secure installation.
    Affected if The blocking.php endpoint is present and accessible via the web server
  4. Test url parameter for reflected input
    Send a crafted request to /blocking.php with a test value in the url parameter (e.g., url=test123) and examine if the value is reflected in the response without sanitization or encoding.
    Affected if The url parameter reflects user-supplied input directly in the HTML response without validation or escaping

The environment is affected if PineApp Mail Secure version is below 5.2.1 and the /blocking.php endpoint reflects the url parameter without sanitization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.2.1 or later
Fixed in 5.2.1
Interim mitigation

Implement proper input validation and output encoding for the url parameter in blocking.php. Use allowlist validation for expected URL formats and apply context-appropriate escaping before rendering any user-supplied data in HTML output.

Recommended fix High confidence

Mail Secure version 5.2.1 or later

  1. 1. Verify current Mail Secure version by checking the system administration console or using the built-in version check command
  2. 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
  3. 3. Back up the current Mail Secure configuration and database according to standard backup procedures
  4. 4. Download Mail Secure version 5.2.1 or later from the official vendor distribution channel
  5. 5. Apply the upgrade following the vendor's documented upgrade procedure for Mail Secure
  6. 6. After upgrade completion, verify the blocking.php endpoint now properly sanitizes the url parameter
  7. 7. Test that the XSS payload <script>alert(1)</script> is no longer executable in the url parameter
  8. 8. Verify all other Mail Secure functions are operating normally
Caveat Review vendor release notes for 5.2.1 to check for any configuration changes or compatibility considerations with existing mail systems

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Mail Secure Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-36720 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-36720 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data