PlutoApplication · Apache

CVE-2021-36737

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-01-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.1.1 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The input fields of the Apache Pluto UrlTestPortlet are vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. Users should migrate to version 3.1.1 of the v3-demo-portlet.war artifact

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Apache Pluto UrlTestPortlet contains reflected XSS vulnerabilities in its input fields. User-supplied input is rendered back to the browser without proper sanitization or output encoding, allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the context of other users' sessions.

MitigationMigrate to version 3.1.1 of the v3-demo-portlet.war artifact to obtain the patched version.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PlutoApplication
Affected:< 3.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Apache Pluto installation
    Locate the Apache Pluto installation directory or WAR files deployed to your servlet container. Look for pluto*.war files or a pluto deployment directory.
    Affected if Apache Pluto is present on the system with a version earlier than 3.1.1
  2. Check v3-demo-portlet.war version
    Find the v3-demo-portlet.war file or its extracted deployment directory. Check the version manifest or filename for version information below 3.1.1.
    Affected if The v3-demo-portlet.war version is earlier than 3.1.1
  3. Verify UrlTestPortlet is deployed
    Examine the deployed portlet applications to confirm the UrlTestPortlet from the v3-demo-portlet is currently active and accessible.
    Affected if The UrlTestPortlet is currently deployed and accessible to users
  4. Test for reflected XSS in input fields
    Access the UrlTestPortlet interface and submit a test payload containing script tags or HTML in the URL input field, then inspect the response to see if input is reflected without encoding.
    Affected if User-supplied input is returned in the response without proper sanitization or HTML encoding

A user is affected if Apache Pluto with v3-demo-portlet.war version earlier than 3.1.1 is deployed and the UrlTestPortlet is accessible, allowing unsanitized input reflection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.1.1 or later
Fixed in 3.1.1
Interim mitigation

Migrate to version 3.1.1 of the v3-demo-portlet.war artifact to obtain the patched version.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Apache Pluto v3-demo-portlet.war version 3.1.1

  1. 1. Identify the current version of Apache Pluto and the v3-demo-portlet.war artifact deployed in your environment
  2. 2. Download version 3.1.1 of the v3-demo-portlet.war artifact from the official Apache Pluto distribution
  3. 3. Backup your current deployment configuration and data
  4. 4. Undeploy the vulnerable v3-demo-portlet.war from your portal container
  5. 5. Deploy the fixed v3-demo-portlet.war version 3.1.1
  6. 6. Restart the portal container to ensure the new version is fully initialized
  7. 7. Verify the UrlTestPortlet is functioning correctly and that the XSS vulnerability is remediated by testing input fields with benign script payloads

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Pluto Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-36737 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-36737 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data