CVE-2021-36783
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Insufficiently Protected Credentials vulnerability in SUSE Rancher allows authenticated Cluster Owners, Cluster Members, Project Owners and Project Members to read credentials, passwords and API tokens that have been stored in cleartext and exposed via API endpoints. This issue affects: SUSE Rancher Rancher versions prior to 2.6.4; Rancher versions prior to 2.5.13.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSUSE Rancher versions prior to 2.6.4 and 2.5.13 expose sensitive credentials, passwords, and API tokens in cleartext through API endpoints. Authenticated users with Cluster Owner, Cluster Member, Project Owner, or Project Member roles can read credentials stored in the system that they should not have access to, representing an insufficient access control vulnerability allowing unauthorized credential disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.5.0, < 2.5.13>= 2.6.0, < 2.6.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Rancher versionNavigate to the Rancher UI footer or use the API endpoint /version to determine the exact version number runningAffected if Version is 2.5.0 through 2.5.12, or 2.6.0 through 2.6.3 (meaning version is less than 2.5.13 or 2.6.4)
-
Verify user role assignmentsReview user role bindings in Rancher under Users and Authentication. Check if any users are assigned Cluster Owner, Cluster Member, Project Owner, or Project Member rolesAffected if Lower-privileged users (non-admin) with these roles exist in the system
-
Test API credential disclosureUsing an authenticated session with a Cluster Owner/Member or Project Owner/Member role, query the Rancher API endpoints for secrets or credentials (such as /v3/secrets or /v3/clustersecrets) for clusters or projects the user does not ownAffected if The API returns credential data (passwords, API tokens, access keys) in cleartext that the requesting user should not have permission to view
-
Review API access logsExamine Rancher API audit logs (available in the UI under /v3/eventLogs or the Kubernetes audit logs) for requests to credential-related endpoints by non-admin usersAffected if Logs show Cluster Owner, Cluster Member, Project Owner, or Project Member users accessing credential endpoints for resources outside their authorized scope
You are affected if your Rancher version is below 2.5.13 or 2.6.4 AND lower-privileged users with Cluster Owner, Cluster Member, Project Owner, or Project Member roles can retrieve credentials they should not access through the API.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.5.132.6.4
Upgrade SUSE Rancher to version 2.6.4 or 2.5.13 or later to patch the insufficient credential protection. Review API access logs for signs of unauthorized credential exfiltration by lower-privileged users.
Rancher 2.5.13 or 2.6.4 (depending on your current branch)
- 1. Take a complete backup of your Rancher environment including etcd snapshots and any critical data.
- 2. If running Rancher 2.5.x, upgrade to version 2.5.13 or later.
- 3. If running Rancher 2.6.x, upgrade to version 2.6.4 or later.
- 4. After upgrade, verify the API endpoints no longer expose credentials, passwords, or API tokens in cleartext.
- 5. Confirm all Cluster Owners, Cluster Members, Project Owners, and Project Members can no longer access stored credentials through the API.
- 6. Review user role assignments to ensure only appropriate administrators have access to sensitive credentials.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-36783 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-36783 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data