CVE-2021-37181
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Cerberus DMS V4.0 (All versions), Cerberus DMS V4.1 (All versions), Cerberus DMS V4.2 (All versions), Cerberus DMS V5.0 (All versions < v5.0 QU1), Desigo CC Compact V4.0 (All versions), Desigo CC Compact V4.1 (All versions), Desigo CC Compact V4.2 (All versions), Desigo CC Compact V5.0 (All versions < V5.0 QU1), Desigo CC V4.0 (All versions), Desigo CC V4.1 (All versions), Desigo CC V4.2 (All versions), Desigo CC V5.0 (All versions < V5.0 QU1). The application deserialises untrusted data without sufficient validations, that could result in an arbitrary deserialization. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute code in the affected system. The CCOM communication component used for Windows App / Click-Once and IE Web / XBAP client connectivity are affected by the vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in the CCOM communication component of Cerberus DMS and Desigo CC products. The application deserializes untrusted data without sufficient validation, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution via malicious serialized objects.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0= 4.1= 4.2= 5.0= 4.0= 4.1= 4.2= 5.0= 4.0= 4.1= 4.2= 5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed product versionCheck the installed version of Cerberus DMS, Desigo CC, or Desigo CC Compact via the application's About section, Windows Programs and Features, or the installation directory's version infoAffected if The installed version is 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, or 5.0
-
Locate CCOM communication componentSearch for CCOM-related DLL files or services on the system. Common locations include the application installation directory (e.g., C:\Program Files\Siemens\Desigo or Cerberus\) and check for files with 'CCOM' in the nameAffected if CCOM component files exist on the system and the product version is in the affected range
-
Verify CCOM service statusOpen Windows Services console (services.msc) and look for services related to CCOM, Click-Once, or IE Web/XBAP client connectivity that are associated with the Siemens productAffected if Any CCOM-related Windows services are running (started) on the system
-
Check network exposure of CCOMReview network configuration or firewall rules to determine if the CCOM communication ports are exposed to untrusted networks. Check if the application is listening on ports typically used by CCOMAffected if CCOM services are listening on network-accessible ports without proper network segmentation
The system is affected if Cerberus DMS, Desigo CC, or Desigo CC Compact version 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, or 5.0 is installed with the CCOM communication component enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patches (QU1 for v5.0 versions, or upgrade to patched versions for V4.x). If patching is not immediately possible, disable the CCOM Windows App/Click-Once and IE Web/XBAP client connectivity services and implement network segmentation to limit exposure.
Desigo CC/Cerberus DMS V5.0 QU1 (or later)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Cerberus DMS or Desigo CC version in your environment.
- 2. For Cerberus DMS V5.0 and Desigo CC V5.0: Upgrade to version v5.0 QU1 (or later) which contains the vendor patch for this vulnerability.
- 3. For Cerberus DMS V4.0, V4.1, V4.2 and Desigo CC V4.0, V4.1, V4.2: These versions have no vendor-provided patch. Upgrade to Desigo CC V5.0 QU1 or later.
- 4. For Desigo CC Compact V5.0: Upgrade to V5.0 QU1 or later.
- 5. For Desigo CC Compact V4.0, V4.1, V4.2: These versions have no vendor-provided patch. Upgrade to Desigo CC Compact V5.0 QU1 or later.
- 6. After upgrading, verify the CCOM communication component is updated and running the fixed version.
- 7. Restrict network access to the CCOM component to reduce exposure from unauthenticated attackers.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA12.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $16,384.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-37181 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-37181 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data