CVE-2021-37698
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIcinga is a monitoring system which checks the availability of network resources, notifies users of outages, and generates performance data for reporting. In versions 2.5.0 through 2.13.0, ElasticsearchWriter, GelfWriter, InfluxdbWriter and Influxdb2Writer do not verify the server's certificate despite a certificate authority being specified. Icinga 2 instances which connect to any of the mentioned time series databases (TSDBs) using TLS over a spoofable infrastructure should immediately upgrade to version 2.13.1, 2.12.6, or 2.11.11 to patch the issue. Such instances should also change the credentials (if any) used by the TSDB writer feature to authenticate against the TSDB. There are no workarounds aside from upgrading.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe ElasticsearchWriter, GelfWriter, InfluxdbWriter, and Influxdb2Writer features in Icinga 2 versions 2.5.0-2.13.0 fail to validate TLS server certificates even when a certificate authority is explicitly configured, enabling man-in-the-middle attacks on networks where traffic can be spoofed or intercepted.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0>= 2.5.0, < 2.11.10>= 2.12.0, < 2.12.6>= 2.13.0, < 2.13.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Icinga 2 versionRun 'icinga2 --version' or check the package version using your system package manager (e.g., 'dpkg -l icinga2' on Debian)Affected if The installed version is 2.5.0 through 2.13.0 (specifically < 2.11.10, or >= 2.12.0 and < 2.12.6, or >= 2.13.0 and < 2.13.1)
-
Identify enabled TSDB writer featuresList files in /etc/icinga2/features-enabled/ directory and look for: elasticsearchwriter.conf, gelfwriter.conf, influxdbwriter.conf, influxdb2writer.confAffected if Any of these feature configuration files are present and enabled
-
Verify TLS configuration in writer featuresExamine the configuration file for each enabled writer (e.g., /etc/icinga2/features-enabled/influxdbwriter.conf) and check if the 'enable_tls' or 'tls' setting is set to 'true' or if a 'ca_file' or 'tls_cert_path' is configuredAffected if TLS is enabled or a CA is configured for any of the affected writers
-
Confirm certificate validation behaviorReview the feature configuration for the 'tls_verify' or 'ssl_verify' parameter. If absent or set to 'false', TLS certificate validation is disabledAffected if Certificate verification is disabled or not explicitly set to 'true' for TLS-enabled connections
You are affected if Icinga 2 version is within the vulnerable range AND any of ElasticsearchWriter, GelfWriter, InfluxdbWriter, or Influxdb2Writer features are enabled with TLS configured but certificate validation is not explicitly enforced.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.11.102.12.62.13.1
Upgrade Icinga 2 to version 2.13.1, 2.12.6, or 2.11.11, and rotate credentials used by the affected TSDB writer features.
2.13.1 (or 2.12.6/2.11.11 depending on compatibility with existing setup)
- 1. Identify which TSDB writer features are enabled in Icinga 2 (ElasticsearchWriter, GelfWriter, InfluxdbWriter, or Influxdb2Writer)
- 2. Plan the upgrade to one of the fixed versions: 2.13.1, 2.12.6, or 2.11.11
- 3. Backup the Icinga 2 configuration and database before upgrading
- 4. Upgrade Icinga 2 to the chosen fixed version using the package manager (apt-get for Debian)
- 5. After upgrade, restart the Icinga 2 service
- 6. Change the credentials used by the TSDB writer features to authenticate against the time series databases
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-37698 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-37698 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data