Operations BridgeApplication · Microfocus

CVE-2021-38125

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-04-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Micro Focus Operations Bridge containerized, affecting versions 2021.05, 2021.08, and newer versions of Micro Focus Operations Bridge containerized if the deployment was upgraded from 2021.05 or 2021.08. The vulnerability could be exploited to unauthenticated remote code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in Micro Focus Operations Bridge containerized allows attackers to execute arbitrary code without any credentials. The flaw affects versions 2021.05, 2021.08, and newer versions that were upgraded from these releases.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches or upgrade to a secure version of Micro Focus Operations Bridge containerized. Consider network isolation and web application firewall rules as compensating controls until patching is possible.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Operations BridgeApplication
Affected:>= 2021.08= 2021.05

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Micro Focus Operations Bridge containerized is deployed
    Search for container images, pods, or installations named 'operations-bridge' or 'microfocus-operations-bridge' in your container orchestration platform (Kubernetes, OpenShift, Docker). Use commands like 'kubectl get pods -A | grep -i operations' or 'docker ps -a | grep -i microfocus'.
    Affected if The product is present in your environment
  2. Determine the installed version of the containerized product
    Check the container image tag or deployment configuration for the version number. Use 'kubectl get deployment -A -o yaml' or inspect the container image tags directly. Look for versions 2021.05, 2021.08, or any 2021.xx versions that were upgraded from these releases.
    Affected if The installed version is 2021.05, 2021.08, or a newer version that was upgraded from either of these releases
  3. Check if the management interface is network-exposed
    Review your network policies, ingress rules, and service configurations. Check if ports used by Operations Bridge (typically 8080, 8443, or as configured) are exposed to untrusted networks or the public internet without authentication.
    Affected if The management interface is accessible from untrusted networks without authentication
  4. Verify upgrade history from affected versions
    Review container deployment logs, CI/CD pipelines, or upgrade documentation to determine if the current installation was originally deployed as version 2021.05 or 2021.08 and subsequently upgraded.
    Affected if The installation was originally version 2021.05 or 2021.08 and has been upgraded to a later version

You are affected if Micro Focus Operations Bridge containerized is deployed and the version is 2021.05, 2021.08, or any later version that was originally deployed as one of these two versions and then upgraded.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches or upgrade to a secure version of Micro Focus Operations Bridge containerized. Consider network isolation and web application firewall rules as compensating controls until patching is possible.

Fix this in Operations Bridge Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,690
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-38125 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-38125 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data