Roxy WiApplication

CVE-2021-38168

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-08-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.2.2.0 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Roxy-WI through 5.2.2.0 allows authenticated SQL injection via select_servers.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Roxy-WI versions through 5.2.2.0 contain an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the select_servers parameter. An authenticated attacker can inject malicious SQL queries through this parameter to manipulate database queries, potentially allowing data exfiltration, modification, or administrative access.

MitigationRemediate by implementing parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database operations involving user input, specifically the select_servers parameter. Apply input validation and least-privilege database accounts to limit impact.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Roxy WiApplication
Affected:<= 5.2.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Roxy-WI installation
    Locate Roxy-WI by checking common installation directories (such as /opt/roxy-wi, /usr/local/roxy-wi, or the web server root), or by searching for roxy-wi related files using: find / -name '*roxy*' -type f 2>/dev/null | head -20
    Affected if Roxy-WI software is found on the system
  2. Determine installed Roxy-WI version
    Check the version by inspecting the web interface footer, looking for a version file (often named version, ver, or similar in the installation directory), or checking package information if installed via a package manager
    Affected if The installed version is 5.2.2.0 or any version lower (e.g., 5.2.1.0, 5.1.x, 5.0.x)
  3. Verify authentication is enabled for the select_servers function
    Examine the web application's authentication configuration and determine if the select_servers parameter endpoint is accessible to authenticated users. Check application logs or configuration files for role-based access settings related to server selection features
    Affected if The select_servers parameter endpoint is accessible without additional authentication barriers beyond basic user login
  4. Review database query logs for anomalies
    Examine database logs (MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQLite depending on configuration) for unusual or suspicious SQL queries, especially those containing string literals, comments (--, /* */), or UNION statements in the select_servers context
    Affected if Unexpected SQL patterns or injection attempts appear in database query logs
  5. Check web application logs for exploitation attempts
    Review web server access logs (typically in /var/log/httpd, /var/log/nginx, or within the Roxy-WI logs directory) for requests to endpoints handling the select_servers parameter with unusual payloads
    Affected if Requests containing SQL injection patterns (quotes, UNION, comment symbols) in select_servers parameter are found in logs

A system is affected if Roxy-WI version 5.2.2.0 or lower is installed and the select_servers functionality is accessible to authenticated users, warranting further investigation for indicators of compromise.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.2.2.0
Interim mitigation

Remediate by implementing parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database operations involving user input, specifically the select_servers parameter. Apply input validation and least-privilege database accounts to limit impact.

Fix this in Roxy Wi Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-38168 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-38168 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data