EximApplication

CVE-2021-38371

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-08-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.94.2 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The STARTTLS feature in Exim through 4.94.2 allows response injection (buffering) during MTA SMTP sending.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The STARTTLS feature in Exim MTA through version 4.94.2 contains a response injection vulnerability caused by improper buffering during SMTP communication. This allows an attacker to potentially inject malicious responses during the TLS handshake phase when Exim is sending mail as an MTA, compromising the integrity of the SMTP session.

MitigationUpgrade Exim to version 4.94.3 or later to obtain the patch for this vulnerability. If immediate upgrading is not feasible, consider disabling STARTTLS or implementing additional network-level controls, though upgrading is the recommended solution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
EximApplication
Affected:<= 4.94.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed Exim version
    Run 'exim --version' or check the package manager (dpkg -l | grep exim, rpm -q exim)
    Affected if Version is 4.94.2 or lower
  2. Locate Exim configuration file
    Common paths: /etc/exim/exim.conf, /etc/exim4/exim4.conf. Run 'exim -bP | grep config_file' to find the active config path
    Affected if Configuration file exists and uses STARTTLS settings
  3. Verify STARTTLS is enabled in outgoing SMTP
    Search the config file for 'tls_on_connect' or 'tls' directives in the 'remote_smtp' transport section. Run: grep -E '(tls|starttls)' /etc/exim*/exim*.conf
    Affected if STARTTLS is enabled for outgoing mail delivery (remote_smtp transport)
  4. Check if Exim is configured to act as an MTA sending mail
    Review the 'remote_smtp' transport configuration. Run: exim -bT remote_smtp to view the transport settings
    Affected if Exim is configured to send mail to external hosts using STARTTLS

You are affected if Exim version is 4.94.2 or lower AND STARTTLS is enabled for outgoing SMTP connections in the remote_smtp transport configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.94.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Exim to version 4.94.3 or later to obtain the patch for this vulnerability. If immediate upgrading is not feasible, consider disabling STARTTLS or implementing additional network-level controls, though upgrading is the recommended solution.

Recommended fix High confidence

Exim 4.95 or later

  1. 1. Check the current Exim version using: exim -version or dpkg -l | grep exim
  2. 2. If running Exim <= 4.94.2, upgrade to Exim 4.95 or later using the package manager or source compilation
  3. 3. For Debian/Ubuntu: apt-get update && apt-get install exim4
  4. 4. For RHEL/CentOS: yum update exim
  5. 5. After upgrade, verify the new version: exim -version
  6. 6. Test SMTP functionality with STARTTLS to ensure the fix is working properly
  7. 7. Review /var/log/exim/mainlog for any STARTTLS-related errors
Caveat Minimal expected; Exim 4.95 was primarily a security release fixing STARTTLS issues

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Exim Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-38371 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-38371 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data