CVE-2021-38399
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHoneywell Experion PKS C200, C200E, C300, and ACE controllers are vulnerable to relative path traversal, which may allow an attacker access to unauthorized files and directories.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a relative path traversal vulnerability in Honeywell Experion PKS C200, C200E, C300, and ACE controllers. The flaw allows remote attackers to access unauthorized files and directories on the affected controllers by using relative path sequences (e.g., '../') in crafted requests, potentially exposing sensitive system files, configurations, or credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Honeywell Experion PKS controllers in the environmentInventory your network for Honeywell Experion PKS controllers - specifically C200, C200E, C300, or Application Control Environment (ACE) devices. Check your asset management system or perform network scanning for these device types.Affected if Any Honeywell C200, C200E, C300, or ACE controller is present in the environment
-
Determine the firmware version of the controllerAccess the controller's web management interface or use the vendor's diagnostic tools to retrieve the firmware version. Compare this version against the affected ranges.Affected if The controller runs any firmware version (all versions of the listed products are affected)
-
Verify if the management interface is network-accessibleCheck if the controller's web interface or management ports are exposed to the network. Use network scanning to identify open ports on these devices, particularly HTTP/HTTPS ports typically used for web management.Affected if The controller's web management interface is accessible from network segments outside the isolated control system network
-
Review logs for path traversal attemptsExamine the controller's access logs and security logs for requests containing relative path sequences such as '../', '..\', or unusual file path patterns that may indicate exploitation attempts.Affected if Path traversal patterns are found in the logs or network traffic to the controller
-
Check for unauthorized file access or credential exposureAudit system files, configurations, and credential stores on the controller for signs of unauthorized access. Look for unexpected changes to configuration files or access to system directories.Affected if Evidence of unauthorized file access or exposure of sensitive configuration files is found
If your environment contains any Honeywell C200, C200E, C300, or ACE controllers with their management interfaces accessible on the network, you are potentially affected by this path traversal vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patches or firmware updates for the affected controller models. Additionally, implement network segmentation to isolate ICS devices, restrict access to management interfaces via firewall rules, and monitor for suspicious path traversal patterns in network traffic.
- Consultation12.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $16,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-38399 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-38399 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data