Fast DdsApplication · Eprosima

CVE-2021-38425

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-05-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.4.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
eProsima Fast DDS versions prior to 2.4.0 (#2269) are susceptible to exploitation when an attacker sends a specially crafted packet to flood a target device with unwanted traffic, which may result in a denial-of-service condition and information exposure.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

eProsima Fast DDS versions before 2.4.0 contain a vulnerability in the RTPS wire protocol implementation where specially crafted packets can be sent to flood a target device, causing denial of service and exposing sensitive information.

MitigationUpgrade eProsima Fast DDS to version 2.4.0 or later to patch the vulnerability. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, restrict network access to DDS endpoints and implement rate limiting on RTPS ports.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Fast DdsApplication
Affected:< 2.4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed eProsima Fast DDS version
    Run package manager commands or check build artifacts to retrieve the installed Fast DDS version (e.g., dpkg -l, rpm -qa, or inspect library version strings in the installed binaries)
    Affected if The detected version is below 2.4.0
  2. Confirm RTPS wire protocol is in use
    Inspect application configuration files or runtime settings to verify that DDS participants are using RTPS for communication (RTPS is the default wire protocol in Fast DDS but verify participant configurations)
    Affected if RTPS participants are configured and actively communicating on the network
  3. Check network exposure of RTPS ports
    Audit firewall rules, networkACLs, or host-based filters to determine if RTPS ports (typically 7400-7404 by default, or custom ports if configured) are accessible from untrusted network segments
    Affected if RTPS ports are open to untrusted or public network interfaces without filtering
  4. Verify if rate limiting or network segmentation is applied
    Review any existing network protection mechanisms such as rate limiting on RTPS ports or network segmentation isolating DDS endpoints
    Affected if No rate limiting or network segmentation is implemented and the version is vulnerable

Environment is affected if eProsima Fast DDS version is below 2.4.0 and RTPS protocol is enabled with network exposure to untrusted sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.4.0 or later
Fixed in 2.4.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade eProsima Fast DDS to version 2.4.0 or later to patch the vulnerability. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, restrict network access to DDS endpoints and implement rate limiting on RTPS ports.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Fast DDS 2.4.0 or later

  1. 1. Identify all systems running Fast DDS instances in your infrastructure
  2. 2. Check current Fast DDS version on each affected system using package manager or build system (e.g., `dpkg -l | grep fast-dds` or `cmake` configuration)
  3. 3. Stop any running Fast DDS applications or services before upgrading
  4. 4. Upgrade Fast DDS to version 2.4.0 or later using your package manager or build from source: obtain Fast DDS 2.4.0+ from GitHub (github.com/eProsima/Fast-DDS)
  5. 5. Rebuild and redeploy any applications that link against Fast DDS
  6. 6. Restart Fast DDS services and verify normal operation
  7. 7. Monitor for any anomalies and validate the patch is applied by checking the new version
Caveat Review Fast DDS 2.4.0 release notes for any API/ABI changes that may affect existing applications

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Fast Dds Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,760
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-38425 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-38425 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data