CVE-2021-38462
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInHand Networks IR615 Router's Versions 2.3.0.r4724 and 2.3.0.r4870 does not enforce an efficient password policy. This may allow an attacker with obtained user credentials to enumerate passwords and impersonate other application users and perform operations on their behalf.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe InHand Networks IR615 Router versions 2.3.0.r4724 and 2.3.0.r4870 fail to enforce a strong password policy, allowing attackers with obtained user credentials to perform password enumeration and impersonate other application users to carry out unauthorized operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.3.0.r4724= 2.3.0.r4870CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device model and firmware versionAccess the router web interface or check the system status page to locate the device model (IR615) and firmware version information. Alternatively, check the administrative interface or system information page for the exact build version.Affected if The firmware version displayed is 2.3.0.r4724 or 2.3.0.r4870 exactly.
-
Verify password complexity settingsNavigate to the router administrative interface and locate the user account or password policy configuration section. Look for options related to password complexity, minimum length requirements, character type enforcement, or password strength rules.Affected if No password complexity requirements are enforced or the password policy settings are absent, weak, or can be bypassed.
-
Check account lockout configurationIn the router administrative interface, locate security or account settings and look for features such as account lockout, failed login attempt limits, or brute-force protection mechanisms.Affected if Account lockout mechanisms are missing, disabled, or not configurable, allowing unlimited login attempts.
-
Test for user enumeration vulnerabilityAttempt to access the login interface with valid usernames but incorrect passwords. Observe whether the system returns different error messages that reveal whether a username exists (for example, 'user does not exist' versus 'incorrect password').Affected if The system returns distinct error messages that disclose whether a particular username is valid, enabling enumeration of existing user accounts.
-
Verify session management and user impersonation controlsLog into the router with one user account and attempt to access functions or data belonging to a different user account. Check if the system properly validates session tokens or user identity before allowing actions.Affected if A user can perform actions or access resources belonging to another user account without proper authorization validation.
You are affected if your IR615 router runs firmware version 2.3.0.r4724 or 2.3.0.r4870 and the system lacks strong password enforcement, account lockout protections, or properly validates user identity to prevent impersonation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the router firmware to a patched version that enforces strong password complexity requirements and implement account lockout mechanisms to prevent brute-force enumeration attacks.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-38462 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-38462 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data