Foxit ReaderApplication · Foxitsoftware

CVE-2021-38569

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-08-11
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 10.1.4 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows stack consumption via recursive function calls during the handling of XFA forms or link objects.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A stack consumption vulnerability exists in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF versions before 10.1.4, where recursive function calls during XFA (XML Forms Architecture) form or link object handling lead to excessive stack usage. This can cause application denial of service or potentially enable code execution via stack overflow.

MitigationUpgrade Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF to version 10.1.4 or later to receive the patch addressing the recursive call vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Foxit ReaderApplication
Affected:< 10.1.4
PhantompdfApplication
Affected:< 10.1.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Foxit product and version
    Open the application, then navigate to Help > About Foxit Reader (or About PhantomPDF) to display the exact version number. Alternatively, right-click the desktop shortcut and select Properties to view version information from the file details.
    Affected if The displayed version number is lower than 10.1.4 (for example, 10.1.3, 10.1.0, or earlier)
  2. Confirm the specific Foxit product in use
    Determine whether the installed application is Foxit Reader or PhantomPDF, as both are affected by this CVE. Check the application window title bar or the About dialog to identify the product name.
    Affected if The product is either Foxit Reader or PhantomPDF and the version is below 10.1.4
  3. Verify if XFA forms are being used
    Check whether PDF documents being opened contain XFA (XML Forms Architecture) forms. Open a PDF file and look for form fields that use dynamic XML-based form logic, or examine document properties to identify XFA-based forms.
    Affected if XFA-based forms or dynamic PDF documents are regularly opened in the affected version of Foxit Reader or PhantomPDF
  4. Check for link object handling activity
    Review recent workflow or document processing logs if available, or manually test opening PDF documents that contain interactive link objects to observe application behavior.
    Affected if PDFs with complex link objects or interactive elements are processed in an affected version

A user is affected if Foxit Reader or PhantomPDF version is below 10.1.4 and the application processes XFA forms or link objects from PDF documents.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 10.1.4 or later
Fixed in 10.1.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF to version 10.1.4 or later to receive the patch addressing the recursive call vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

10.1.4 or later

  1. Navigate to the official Foxit website at www.foxitsoftware.com
  2. Locate and download Foxit Reader version 10.1.4 or later (or PhantomPDF if using that product)
  3. Uninstall the current version of Foxit Reader or PhantomPDF from the system
  4. Install the downloaded version 10.1.4 or later
  5. Launch the application and verify the version by going to Help > About Foxit Reader to confirm the installed version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Foxit Reader Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-38569 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-38569 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data