CVE-2021-39034
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM MQ 9.1 LTS is vulnerable to a denial of service attack caused by an issue within the channel process. IBM X-Force ID: 213964.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM MQ 9.1 LTS contains a denial of service vulnerability in the channel process component. An attacker can exploit this by sending malicious traffic to the channel process, causing the service to become unavailable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.1.0.0, <= 9.1.0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed IBM MQ versionRun the command 'dspmqver' on the MQ server to display the version information. Alternatively, check the installation directory /opt/mqm or the output of 'mqversion' if available.Affected if The version displayed is 9.1.0.0 through 9.1.0.9 (inclusive)
-
Identify queue managers and their statusRun 'dspmq' to list all queue managers and their current state. Note which queue managers are running.Affected if Any queue manager is running on a version in the affected range (9.1.0.0-9.1.0.9)
-
Check for active channel listenersConnect to each running queue manager using 'runmqsc [qm_name]' and run the command 'LISTENER(*) ALL' to display all configured listeners and their ports/status.Affected if Channel listeners are configured and active on any queue manager using an affected version
-
Verify channel listener network exposureUse 'netstat -an | grep [listener_port]' or 'ss -tlnp | grep [listener_port]' to check which ports the channel listeners are bound to and whether they are listening on external interfaces (0.0.0.0) vs localhost only (127.0.0.1).Affected if Channel listeners are bound to 0.0.0.0 or all interfaces, making them externally accessible
You are affected if any IBM MQ installation on your system runs version 9.1.0.0 through 9.1.0.9 with active channel listeners accessible over the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the IBM MQ 9.1 LTS security patch for CVE-2021-39034. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to MQ channel listeners using firewalls or ACLs to limit exposure.
IBM MQ 9.1.0.10 or later (9.1 LTS Fix Pack 10)
- Verify current IBM MQ version by running 'dspmqver' command
- Review IBM MQ 9.1 LTS fix list at www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6239384 or search for APAR IT36437 which addresses this vulnerability
- Upgrade to IBM MQ 9.1.0.10 or later (the first version that includes the fix for CVE-2021-39034)
- After upgrade, restart the queue manager and channel initiator processes to ensure the fix is active
- Verify the fix is applied by checking the channel process is no longer vulnerable to the DoS condition described in the security bulletin
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-39034 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-39034 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data