CVE-2021-39044
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 214210.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). This allows an attacker to craft malicious requests that are automatically submitted by authenticated users' browsers, exploiting the application's trust in the user's session to perform unauthorized state-changing operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.2.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm installed version of IBM Financial Transaction ManagerLocate and inspect the installed IBM Financial Transaction Manager version number through the product's about panel, version file, or administrative consoleAffected if The installed version is exactly 3.2.4
-
Identify state-changing operations in the applicationReview application functions that modify data or perform actions on behalf of authenticated users, such as transaction processing, configuration changes, or user management endpointsAffected if State-changing operations exist and the application lacks anti-CSRF token protection on these functions
-
Inspect request headers for Origin or Referer validationAnalyze server-side request handling to determine whether Origin and Referer HTTP headers are validated on state-changing requestsAffected if The application does not validate Origin or Referer headers on incoming requests, allowing arbitrary origin submissions
-
Check cookie configuration for SameSite attributeInspect the session cookies and authentication cookies set by the application to determine if SameSite attribute is configuredAffected if Cookies are not configured with SameSite attribute (either Lax or Strict), allowing cross-origin cookie transmission
-
Verify anti-CSRF token implementationExamine forms and state-changing requests to determine if synchronizer token pattern or equivalent anti-CSRF tokens are present and validatedAffected if State-changing requests lack anti-CSRF tokens or the tokens are not validated server-side
You are affected if IBM Financial Transaction Manager version 3.2.4 is installed AND the application lacks anti-CSRF token validation, Origin/Referer header checks, and SameSite cookie attributes on state-changing operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations, validate Origin/Referer headers on server-side requests, and configure SameSite cookie attributes to restrict cross-origin cookie transmission.
3.2.4.1 or later (IBM Financial Transaction Manager fix)
- 1. Obtain the latest IBM Financial Transaction Manager security patch or interim fix from IBM Fix Central (https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/).
- 2. Review the IBM Security Bulletin for CVE-2021-39044 on IBM's support website to confirm the specific fix version and APAR number.
- 3. Download the appropriate fix package for your platform and installation type.
- 4. Apply the fix following the standard IBM Financial Transaction Manager fix installation procedures.
- 5. Verify the fix was applied successfully by checking the installed version and confirming the CSRF protection is now in place.
- 6. Test critical transaction workflows to ensure normal functionality is preserved after the fix.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-39044 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-39044 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data