Cloud Pak For SecurityApplication · Ibm

CVE-2021-39090

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-02-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.10.7.0 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Cloud Pak for Security (CP4S) 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.6.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 216388.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Cloud Pak for Security versions 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.6.0 fails to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), a web security policy mechanism that forces browsers to communicate exclusively over HTTPS. Without HSTS enabled, an attacker performing a man-in-the-middle attack can intercept unencrypted or improperly redirected traffic to obtain sensitive information.

MitigationEnable and configure HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) headers on the IBM Cloud Pak for Security web server or load balancer, ensuring all HTTP responses include the Strict-Transport-Security header with appropriate max-age settings.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Cloud Pak For SecurityApplication
Affected:>= 1.10.0.0, < 1.10.7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed IBM Cloud Pak for Security version
    Locate and retrieve the version number of the installed IBM Cloud Pak for Security instance using the platform's version command or admin console
    Affected if Version is 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.6.0 (versions below 1.10.7.0)
  2. Verify version is within affected range
    Compare your installed version against the affected range: 1.10.0.0 <= version < 1.10.7.0
    Affected if Installed version falls within 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.6.0
  3. Inspect HTTP response headers for HSTS
    Make an HTTPS request to the IBM Cloud Pak for Security web interface and examine the response headers for the presence of Strict-Transport-Security
    Affected if Strict-Transport-Security header is missing or not present in HTTPS responses
  4. Check HSTS configuration on web server or load balancer
    Review the configuration of the web server or load balancer fronting IBM Cloud Pak for Security to determine if HSTS headers are enabled and properly configured
    Affected if HSTS is not enabled or configured in the web server/load balancer

If the installed version is 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.6.0 AND HSTS headers are not present in HTTPS responses, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.10.7.0 or later
Fixed in 1.10.7.0
Interim mitigation

Enable and configure HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) headers on the IBM Cloud Pak for Security web server or load balancer, ensuring all HTTP responses include the Strict-Transport-Security header with appropriate max-age settings.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.10.7.0

  1. Upgrade IBM Cloud Pak for Security from any affected version (1.10.0.0 - 1.10.6.0) to version 1.10.7.0 or later
  2. Follow IBM's standard upgrade documentation for Cloud Pak for Security
  3. After upgrade, verify that HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is enabled by checking the application configuration
  4. Test the environment to confirm the fix is applied and HSTS headers are being sent

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Cloud Pak For Security Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-39090 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-39090 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data