MitmproxyApplication

CVE-2021-39214

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-09-16
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 7.0.2 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
mitmproxy is an interactive, SSL/TLS-capable intercepting proxy. In mitmproxy 7.0.2 and below, a malicious client or server is able to perform HTTP request smuggling attacks through mitmproxy. This means that a malicious client/server could smuggle a request/response through mitmproxy as part of another request/response's HTTP message body. While a smuggled request is still captured as part of another request's body, it does not appear in the request list and does not go through the usual mitmproxy event hooks, where users may have implemented custom access control checks or input sanitization. Unless one uses mitmproxy to protect an HTTP/1 service, no action is required. The vulnerability has been fixed in mitmproxy 7.0.3 and above.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

mitmproxy versions 7.0.2 and below contain a vulnerability allowing HTTP request smuggling attacks. A malicious server can smuggle additional HTTP requests within the body of a response, and these smuggled requests bypass mitmproxy's normal capture and event hook processing, allowing them to evade access control checks and input sanitization implemented by users.

MitigationUpgrade mitmproxy to version 7.0.3 or higher. If using mitmproxy to protect HTTP/1 services, verify that the upgrade is applied and test that smuggled requests are now properly detected and logged.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MitmproxyApplication
Affected:<= 7.0.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed mitmproxy version
    Run `mitmproxy --version` or `pip show mitmproxy` to see the installed version number
    Affected if Version is 7.0.2 or lower (e.g., 7.0.0, 6.0.2, 5.x, etc.)
  2. Confirm mitmproxy is actively proxying HTTP/1 traffic
    Review your mitmproxy configuration or running instance to verify it is handling HTTP/1 connections from clients
    Affected if mitmproxy is proxying HTTP/1 traffic with a version <= 7.0.2
  3. Inspect proxy logs for unexpected request patterns
    Review mitmproxy logs or generated HAR/flow files for requests that appear without corresponding client connection entries or event hooks
    Affected if Smuggled requests appear in backend systems but are absent from mitmproxy flow logs or event triggers

You are affected if mitmproxy version is 7.0.2 or lower and it is actively proxying HTTP/1 connections, allowing smuggled requests to bypass mitmproxy's capture and event processing.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 7.0.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade mitmproxy to version 7.0.3 or higher. If using mitmproxy to protect HTTP/1 services, verify that the upgrade is applied and test that smuggled requests are now properly detected and logged.

Recommended fix High confidence

mitmproxy 7.0.3 or higher

  1. Ensure you have a backup of your mitmproxy configuration and any custom addons or scripts
  2. Stop any running mitmproxy instance
  3. Upgrade mitmproxy using your package manager or pip: pip install --upgrade mitmproxy
  4. Verify the installed version is 7.0.3 or higher by running: mitmproxy --version
  5. Restart mitmproxy with your configuration
  6. Test that your workflows and any custom addons still function correctly

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Mitmproxy Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,190
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,904.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-39214 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-39214 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data