OzoneApplication · Apache

CVE-2021-39234

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-11-19
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.2.0 or later.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In Apache Ozone versions prior to 1.2.0, Authenticated users knowing the ID of an existing block can craft specific request allowing access those blocks, bypassing other security checks like ACL.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Apache Ozone versions before 1.2.0 contain an authorization bypass where authenticated users who know the ID of an existing block can craft specific requests to access those blocks, bypassing ACL security checks.

MitigationUpgrade Apache Ozone to version 1.2.0 or later to obtain the security fix.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OzoneApplication
Affected:< 1.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if Apache Ozone is installed
    Run 'ozone version' or look for ozone binaries in common locations such as /usr/bin/ozone, /opt/ozone/, or check for ozone services running via 'systemctl list-units | grep ozone' or 'ps aux | grep ozone'
    Affected if Apache Ozone is not found in the environment, so this CVE does not apply
  2. Determine the installed Ozone version
    Execute 'ozone version' or check the RPM/DEB package version with 'rpm -q ozone' or 'dpkg -l | grep ozone'
    Affected if The version number is lower than 1.2.0 (for example, 1.1.0, 1.0.0, or any 0.x release)
  3. Verify block access mechanism is in use
    Check if Ozone block token service is enabled by reviewing ozone-site.xml for 'ozone.security.token.service.enabled' set to true, or check if the block ownership feature is active
    Affected if Block token service or block ownership is enabled and the version is below 1.2.0, making the authorization bypass exploitable

You are affected if Apache Ozone version is below 1.2.0 and the block token/block ownership mechanism is enabled, allowing authenticated users to bypass ACLs when accessing blocks by ID.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.2.0 or later
Fixed in 1.2.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Apache Ozone to version 1.2.0 or later to obtain the security fix.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.2.0

  1. Verify the current Apache Ozone version using 'ozone version' or checking the installed package
  2. Review the Apache Ozone 1.2.0 release notes for any migration requirements or configuration changes
  3. Stop all Ozone services ( ozone datanode, ozone manager, ozone scm, ozone s3g, ozone recon)
  4. Back up the Ozone metadata directory and configuration files
  5. Upgrade Ozone packages to version 1.2.0 or later using the appropriate package manager or build system
  6. Update ozone-site.xml configuration if any new properties are required for 1.2.0
  7. Start Ozone services in the correct order: SCM first, then OM, then Datanodes and other services
  8. Verify the upgrade by checking service logs and running 'ozone admin info'

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ozone Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-39234 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-39234 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data