CVE-2021-39254
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA crafted NTFS image can cause an integer overflow in memmove, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in the function ntfs_attr_record_resize, in NTFS-3G < 2021.8.22.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA specially crafted NTFS image triggers an integer overflow in memmove, which leads to a heap-based buffer overflow in the ntfs_attr_record_resize function in NTFS-3G versions prior to 2021.8.22. The vulnerability allows potential code execution or denial of service when mounting a malicious NTFS volume.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0= 10.0= 11.0= 33= 35< 2021.8.22CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check NTFS-3G package versionRun `ntfs-3g --version` or check your package manager (dpkg -l ntfs-3g or rpm -q ntfs-3g)Affected if The version displayed is earlier than 2021.8.22 or the package is not found at the latest version
-
Verify ntfs-3g binary existsCheck if the ntfs-3g binary is present: `which ntfs-3g` or `ls -l /sbin/mount.ntfs*`Affected if The ntfs-3g binary is present and outdated
-
Identify NTFS mounting capabilityCheck if the system uses NTFS-3G for mounting: examine /proc/filesystems for ntfs and check mount utility capabilitiesAffected if NTFS support is enabled via ntfs-3g and the version is vulnerable
You are affected if NTFS-3G version is below 2021.8.22 and the system can mount NTFS volumes using this tool.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2021.8.22
Upgrade NTFS-3G to version 2021.8.22 or later. Avoid mounting untrusted or unknown NTFS images until the patch is applied.
NTFS-3G >= 2021.8.22
- 1. Check the current NTFS-3G version installed on the system using 'ntfs-3g --version' or the package manager.
- 2. For Debian-based systems (Debian 9, 10, 11): Run 'sudo apt-get update' followed by 'sudo apt-get install ntfs-3g' to upgrade to the latest available version in the repositories, or download and install NTFS-3G version 2021.8.22 or later from source.
- 3. For Fedora systems (33, 35): Run 'sudo dnf update ntfs-3g' to upgrade to the latest version including the fix.
- 4. For Gentoo systems: Run 'sudo emerge --sync' and then 'sudo emerge -av sys-fs/ntfs3g' to upgrade to the patched version.
- 5. After upgrade, verify the installed version is 2021.8.22 or later using 'ntfs-3g --version'.
- 6. Recreate any NTFS mounts to ensure the updated library is loaded.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-39254 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-39254 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data