CVE-2021-39257
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA crafted NTFS image with an unallocated bitmap can lead to a endless recursive function call chain (starting from ntfs_attr_pwrite), causing stack consumption in NTFS-3G < 2021.8.22.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA crafted NTFS image containing an unallocated bitmap triggers an endless recursive function call chain originating from ntfs_attr_pwrite in NTFS-3G versions prior to 2021.8.22. This recursive loop exhausts stack memory, resulting in a denial of service condition (crash or hang) when the malicious image is mounted.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0= 10.0= 11.0< 2021.8.22CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check NTFS-3G versionRun `ntfs-3g --version` or use package manager: `dpkg -l ntfs-3g` (Debian/Ubuntu), `rpm -q ntfs-3g` (Red Hat/CentOS), `pacman -Q ntfs-3g` (Arch).Affected if Version is less than 2021.8.22 (e.g., 2021.4.22, 2020.x) or package is installed but version cannot be determined (older).
-
Verify NTFS-3G binary presenceRun `which ntfs-3g` or list the binary: `ls -l /usr/bin/ntfs-3g /sbin/mount.ntfs`.Affected if The binary exists (indicates NTFS-3G is installed).
-
Check for active NTFS mountsInspect /proc/mounts for any mounts of type ntfs or ntfs-3g: `grep -E 'ntfs|fuse' /proc/mounts`.Affected if There are any NTFS mounts (current usage of NTFS-3G).
-
Check for NTFS entries in /etc/fstabInspect /etc/fstab for any NTFS partitions: `grep -E 'ntfs|fuse' /etc/fstab`.Affected if There are any NTFS entries (system configured to mount NTFS).
If NTFS-3G version is below 2021.8.22 and the system uses NTFS-3G to mount NTFS (either currently mounted or configured), the environment is affected.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2021.8.22
Upgrade NTFS-3G to version 2021.8.22 or later to patch the recursive call vulnerability. Avoid mounting untrusted NTFS images from unknown sources.
NTFS-3G version 2021.8.22 or later (Debian security updates for versions 9.0, 10.0, 11.0)
- Update your package repository metadata: `apt-get update`
- Upgrade NTFS-3G to the fixed version: `apt-get install ntfs-3g`
- Verify the installed version is 2021.8.22 or later: `ntfs-3g --version`
- If the package manager does not provide the fixed version, consider building from source available at https://github.com/tuxera/ntfs-3g/releases/tag/2021.8.22
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-39257 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-39257 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data