Rsa Securid Integration KitApplication · Pingidentity

CVE-2021-39270

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-08-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.2 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In Ping Identity RSA SecurID Integration Kit before 3.2, user impersonation can occur.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Ping Identity RSA SecurID Integration Kit before version 3.2 contains a user impersonation vulnerability allowing an attacker to impersonate valid users, likely through improper session handling or authentication bypass in the integration layer between Ping Identity and RSA SecurID.

MitigationUpgrade the RSA SecurID Integration Kit to version 3.2 or later to obtain the patch for user impersonation; verify the upgrade in a non-production environment before deployment.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Rsa Securid Integration KitApplication
Affected:< 3.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed RSA SecurID Integration Kit version
    Locate the Integration Kit installation directory and check the version file, manifest, or product metadata. Common locations include the Ping Identity deployment directory or the kit's own lib folder. Look for version.info, manifest.mf, or similar version-tracking files.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 3.2 (for example, 3.0, 3.1, or any version number below 3.2).
  2. Confirm RSA SecurID integration is active
    Check the Ping Identity configuration for enabled RSA SecurID authentication mechanisms. Review the PingFederate or PingAccess runtime configuration files for RSA SecurID adapter or token provider references.
    Affected if The RSA SecurID integration kit is deployed and actively handling authentication flows for any application or service.
  3. Review authentication session handling
    Examine logs for session-related events from the integration kit. Look for patterns where session tokens may be improperly validated or where user context switches occur without proper re-authentication.
    Affected if Session handling logs show unexpected user identity changes, duplicate session tokens, or authentication events lacking complete validation traces.

You are affected if the RSA SecurID Integration Kit version is below 3.2 AND the integration is actively deployed in your authentication pipeline.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.2 or later
Fixed in 3.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the RSA SecurID Integration Kit to version 3.2 or later to obtain the patch for user impersonation; verify the upgrade in a non-production environment before deployment.

Recommended fix High confidence

3.2

  1. Download RSA SecurID Integration Kit version 3.2 or later from the official Ping Identity download portal
  2. Back up the current RSA SecurID Integration Kit configuration and any custom files
  3. Install version 3.2 by following the standard Ping Identity kit installation documentation
  4. Restore the backed-up configuration to the new installation
  5. Verify the installation was successful and the kit is functioning correctly
  6. Test user authentication flows to confirm the user impersonation vulnerability is resolved

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Rsa Securid Integration Kit Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,380
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-39270 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-39270 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data