CVE-2021-39627
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn sendLegacyVoicemailNotification of LegacyModeSmsHandler.java, there is a possible permissions bypass due to an unsafe PendingIntent. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-9Android ID: A-185126549
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Android's LegacyModeSmsHandler.java, the sendLegacyVoicemailNotification method uses an unsafe PendingIntent that could allow a local attacker to perform privilege escalation by manipulating the mutable intent flags, bypassing normal permission checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0= 10.0= 11.0= 12.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Android OS versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADBAffected if The version is 9.0, 10.0, 11.0, or 12.0 exactly (not patched)
-
Check security patch levelGo to Settings > About Phone > Security patch level, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' via ADBAffected if The security patch level is earlier than the SVE-2021-185126549 patch date (December 2021 or earlier for affected versions)
-
Identify if LegacyModeSmsHandler component is presentCheck for the presence of framework.jar and inspect LegacyModeSmsHandler.java in the Android framework source code, or use a decompiler on the framework.jar from /system/framework/Affected if The vulnerable sendLegacyVoicemailNotification method exists and uses PendingIntent without FLAG_IMMUTABLE
-
Verify PendingIntent flag usage in vulnerable methodReview the source code of sendLegacyVoicemailNotification in LegacyModeSmsHandler.java for PendingIntent creation - look for getService or getBroadcast calls without FLAG_IMMUTABLE or FLAG_MUTABLE_UNCLEARAffected if PendingIntent is created with mutable flags or no explicit immutability flag, allowing intent manipulation
-
Confirm voicemail/SMS feature is enabledCheck if the device uses legacy SMS/voicemail functionality - this is typically enabled by default on affected Android versions with carrier voicemailAffected if The device has SMS/voicemail capability and the LegacyModeSmsHandler code path can be triggered by a local app
A device is affected if it runs Android 9.0, 10.0, 11.0, or 12.0 without the SVE-2021-185126549 security patch and contains the vulnerable LegacyModeSmsHandler code with unsafe PendingIntent flags.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-provided Android security patch (SVE-2021-185126549) which includes the fix for unsafe PendingIntent. Ensure PendingIntent uses FLAG_IMMUTABLE flag and proper intent handling in the affected code.
Update to Android security patch level January 2022 or later (Android 12, 12L, 11, 10, or 9 with January 2022 patch)
- Go to Settings on the Android device
- Navigate to System > Security (or Settings > Security & Location on some devices)
- Check for and install the latest system update
- Ensure the installed security patch level is January 2022 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-39627 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-39627 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data