AndroidOperating system · Google

CVE-2021-39790

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-03-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In Dialer, there is a possible way to manipulate visual voicemail settings due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-12LAndroid ID: A-186405146

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the Android Dialer application. The issue stems from a missing permission check in the visual voicemail settings functionality, which allows a local attacker to manipulate these settings without proper authorization. User interaction is required for exploitation.

MitigationApply the Android-12L vendor security patch (A-186405146) that implements proper permission validation in the Dialer app's visual voicemail settings code path.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AndroidOperating system
Affected:= 12.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Android version
    Go to Settings > About Phone > Android version or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' in ADB shell
    Affected if Version equals 12.1 (the only affected version listed)
  2. Verify Dialer application is installed
    Check for com.android.dialer package in Settings > Apps or run 'pm list packages | grep dialer' in ADB shell
    Affected if Dialer app is present on the device
  3. Confirm Visual Voicemail is accessible
    Open Dialer app > Settings > Voicemail or check if Visual Voicemail settings menu exists under Calls settings
    Affected if Visual Voicemail settings interface is present and accessible
  4. Check for the missing permission enforcement
    Inspect the Dialer app's visual voicemail settings code (A-186405146 patch reference) or verify if any permission prompt appears when accessing visual voicemail settings without proper authorization
    Affected if No permission validation occurs when manipulating visual voicemail settings

Environment is affected if running Android 12.1 with the Dialer app installed and Visual Voicemail settings are accessible without proper permission checks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Android-12L vendor security patch (A-186405146) that implements proper permission validation in the Dialer app's visual voicemail settings code path.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Android 12L with April 2022 security patch level or later (including Android 13)

  1. Ensure your Android device is running the latest system software by checking for updates in Settings > System > Software Update
  2. Alternatively, update the Google Phone (Dialer) app through Google Play Store to receive the security fix
  3. Verify the patch level after update: go to Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level and confirm it shows April 2022 or later
Caveat Standard Android OS upgrade considerations apply - backup data before major system updates

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Android Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-39790 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-39790 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data