CVE-2021-41000
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple authenticated remote code execution vulnerabilities were discovered in the AOS-CX command line interface in Aruba CX 6200F Switch Series, Aruba 6300 Switch Series, Aruba 6400 Switch Series, Aruba 8320 Switch Series, Aruba 8325 Switch Series, Aruba 8400 Switch Series, Aruba CX 8360 Switch Series version(s): AOS-CX 10.06.xxxx: 10.06.0170 and below, AOS-CX 10.07.xxxx: 10.07.0050 and below, AOS-CX 10.08.xxxx: 10.08.1030 and below. Aruba has released upgrades for Aruba AOS-CX devices that address these security vulnerabilities.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple authenticated remote code execution vulnerabilities exist in the AOS-CX command line interface on Aruba CX 6200F, 6300, 6400, 8320, 8325, 8400, and 8360 switch series. Authenticated users can execute arbitrary code by leveraging vulnerabilities in the CLI, likely through improper input validation or command injection.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.06.0001, <= 10.06.0170>= 10.07.0001, <= 10.07.0020= 10.08.0001CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify switch modelRun 'show version' or 'show system information' from the CLI to retrieve the switch model numberAffected if The model is NOT one of: CX 6200F, 6300, 6400, 8320, 8325, 8400, or 8360 (these are unaffected)
-
Check AOS-CX software versionRun 'show version' from the CLI and locate the 'Software version' or 'AOS-CX' version lineAffected if The installed version falls within these ranges: 10.06.0001-10.06.0170, 10.07.0001-10.07.0020, or equals exactly 10.08.0001
-
Verify CLI access is configuredRun 'show running-config' and search for CLI-related lines, or check that management access includes CLI (port 22 for SSH or console)Affected if CLI access exists (this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable)
-
Confirm authentication methodCheck 'show aaa authentication' and review which authentication servers or local accounts are configured for CLI accessAffected if Local accounts or authenticated users can access the CLI (the vulnerability requires an authenticated CLI session)
You are affected if your switch model is CX 6200F, 6300, 6400, 8320, 8325, 8400, or 8360 AND the AOS-CX version is within the affected ranges AND authenticated CLI access is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade AOS-CX to version 10.06.0171 or higher for 10.06 branches, 10.07.0051 or higher for 10.07 branches, and 10.08.1031 or higher for 10.08 branches. Apply within planned maintenance windows following vendor upgrade procedures.
AOS-CX 10.06.0180 or later for 10.06 branch; AOS-CX 10.07.0030 or later for 10.07 branch; AOS-CX 10.08.1030 or latest 10.08.x for 10.08 branch
- 1. Identify the current AOS-CX version by running 'show version' in the CLI
- 2. Determine which branch (10.06.x, 10.07.x, or 10.08.x) the current version belongs to
- 3. For AOS-CX 10.06.x branch: upgrade to version 10.06.0171 or later (10.06.0180 recommended)
- 4. For AOS-CX 10.07.x branch: upgrade to version 10.07.0021 or later (10.07.0030 recommended)
- 5. For AOS-CX 10.08.x branch: upgrade to version 10.08.0002 or later (10.08.1030 or latest 10.08.xx recommended)
- 6. Download the appropriate firmware from the Aruba support portal (https://asp.arubanetworks.com)
- 7. Upload the firmware to the switch via 'copy tftp://<server>/<file> system: //
- 8. Execute 'boot system <image>' to set the new firmware as the boot image
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-41000 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-41000 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data