CVE-2021-41002
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple authenticated remote path traversal vulnerabilities were discovered in the AOS-CX command line interface in Aruba CX 6200F Switch Series, Aruba 6300 Switch Series, Aruba 6400 Switch Series, Aruba 8320 Switch Series, Aruba 8325 Switch Series, Aruba 8400 Switch Series, Aruba CX 8360 Switch Series version(s): AOS-CX 10.06.xxxx: 10.06.0170 and below, AOS-CX 10.07.xxxx: 10.07.0050 and below, AOS-CX 10.08.xxxx: 10.08.1030 and below, AOS-CX 10.09.xxxx: 10.09.0002 and below. Aruba has released upgrades for Aruba AOS-CX devices that address these security vulnerabilities.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple authenticated remote path traversal vulnerabilities exist in the AOS-CX CLI of Aruba CX switch series. An authenticated attacker with CLI access can manipulate file path references to escape the intended directory and read arbitrary files on the switch filesystem, potentially exposing sensitive system configurations or credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.06.0001, <= 10.06.0170>= 10.07.0001, <= 10.07.0050>= 10.08.0001, <= 10.08.1030>= 10.09.0001, <= 10.09.0002CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the AOS-CX firmware versionRun 'show version' in the CLI or access the switch management interface to view the installed firmware versionAffected if The installed version falls within 10.06.0001-10.06.0170, 10.07.0001-10.07.0050, 10.08.0001-10.08.1030, or 10.09.0001-10.09.0002
-
Verify CLI access is enabledConfirm that the CLI service is active and accessible by logging in or checking 'show cli sessions'Affected if CLI access is available to any authenticated user (the vulnerability requires authenticated CLI access)
-
Review CLI command logging for path traversal patternsInspect CLI audit logs or session logs for commands containing '../' sequences or attempts to access files outside the intended directory (e.g., 'show file /../etc/passwd')Affected if Any log entries show path traversal attempts using '../' in file-related CLI commands
-
Check for unauthorized file readsExamine system logs for unusual file read operations via CLI commands such as 'show file' or 'copy' that access sensitive system filesAffected if Logs reveal file reads from system directories (like /config, /etc) that were not initiated by legitimate administrative actions
A switch is affected if it runs an AOS-CX version within the affected ranges AND has CLI access enabled, regardless of whether exploitation is confirmed in logs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Aruba's firmware upgrades to AOS-CX versions 10.06.0180+, 10.07.0060+, 10.08.1040+, or 10.09.0003+ (or later). Until patched, strictly limit CLI access to trusted administrators and monitor for anomalous file access patterns.
AOS-CX 10.06.0171 or later; 10.07.0051 or later; 10.08.1031 or later; 10.09.0003 or later (per Aruba's release notes)
- Identify the current AOS-CX version by running 'show version' in the CLI
- Determine which version branch your current software falls into (10.06.x, 10.07.x, 10.08.x, or 10.09.x)
- Download the appropriate AOS-CX firmware upgrade from the Aruba support portal (support.arubanetworks.com)
- Upload the new firmware image to the switch using 'copy tftp://<server>/<image> flash:' or via Web UI
- Verify the uploaded image integrity using 'show boot-history' or 'show flash'
- Schedule a maintenance window as the upgrade may cause brief network disruption
- Execute the upgrade using 'boot system <image>' command
- After reboot, verify the new version using 'show version' and confirm the vulnerability is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-41002 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-41002 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data