Ecs Router Controller Ecs FirmwareOperating system · Ecoa

CVE-2021-41295

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-09-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
ECOA BAS controller has a Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability, thus authenticated attacker can remotely place a forged request at a malicious web page and execute CRUD commands (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) to perform arbitrary operations in the system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ECOA BAS controller allows authenticated attackers to trick users into submitting malicious requests from a crafted web page, enabling execution of arbitrary CRUD operations (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) on the building automation system.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations and validate Origin/Referer HTTP headers; alternatively configure SameSite attribute on session cookies to prevent cross-origin request forgery.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ecs Router Controller Ecs FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Riskbuster FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
RiskterminatorApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the ECOA device model
    Access the device web interface or check the device documentation/label to confirm the exact model (Ecs Router Controller, Riskbuster, or Riskterminator) and firmware version
    Affected if The device is any model of Ecs Router Controller, Riskbuster, or Riskterminator with a web interface
  2. Locate the web interface login and state-changing forms
    Navigate to the device web interface and identify forms or endpoints that perform CRUD operations (configuration changes, device control actions, user management)
    Affected if The web interface has interactive forms or API endpoints for configuration or control
  3. Inspect HTML forms for anti-CSRF tokens
    View the page source of state-changing forms (POST/PUT/DELETE endpoints) and search for hidden input fields containing tokens, or check if the form submission includes a token parameter in the request
    Affected if Forms submit requests without any hidden CSRF token parameter present in the HTML
  4. Check session cookie SameSite attribute
    Using browser developer tools, inspect the session cookie (usually named something like JSESSIONID, PHPSESSID, or a custom session identifier) and verify if the SameSite attribute is set to 'Strict' or 'Lax', or not present at all
    Affected if The session cookie has no SameSite attribute or has SameSite set to 'None' without Secure flag
  5. Verify Origin/Referer header validation
    Attempt a cross-origin request to a state-changing endpoint (e.g., using curl with arbitrary Origin header) and observe if the server rejects it with an error or accepts it without validation
    Affected if The server accepts requests with arbitrary Origin/Referer headers without validation

The environment is affected if any ECOA Ecs Router Controller, Riskbuster, or Riskterminator device has a web interface where state-changing operations lack anti-CSRF tokens, have session cookies without proper SameSite attributes, or do not validate Origin/Referer headers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations and validate Origin/Referer HTTP headers; alternatively configure SameSite attribute on session cookies to prevent cross-origin request forgery.

Fix this in Ecs Router Controller Ecs Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
25.0 hours of engineering $4,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-41295 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-41295 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data