CVE-2021-41504
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Elevated Privileges issue exists in D-Link DCS-5000L v1.05 and DCS-932L v2.17 and older. The use of the digest-authentication for the devices command interface may allow further attack vectors that may compromise the cameras configuration and allow malicious users on the LAN to access the device. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe D-Link DCS-5000L and DCS-932L camera firmware contains an elevated privileges vulnerability in the command interface's digest-authentication mechanism. This weak authentication allows malicious users on the same LAN to potentially compromise the device configuration and gain unauthorized access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.17= 1.05CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the camera modelLocate the device physically or check your network inventory for D-Link DCS-932L or DCS-5000L camera models. The model number is usually printed on the device label or visible in the device's web interface login page.Affected if The device is a D-Link DCS-932L or DCS-5000L camera.
-
Determine the installed firmware versionAccess the camera's web interface (typically via its IP address) and navigate to the Settings or System Information page to view the firmware version. Alternatively, check the device label or documentation if physically accessible.Affected if The firmware version is 2.17 or lower for DCS-932L, or exactly version 1.05 for DCS-5000L.
-
Verify web interface accessibilityAttempt to reach the camera's HTTP interface by entering its IP address in a web browser. Look for a login prompt or authentication dialog.Affected if The web interface is accessible and responds to requests.
-
Assess network exposureDetermine whether the camera is on the same network segment as untrusted users or directly accessible from broader network subnets. Check VLAN configuration and firewall rules surrounding the device.Affected if The camera is reachable by other devices on the local network without network isolation.
You are affected if you have a DCS-932L with firmware <= 2.17 or a DCS-5000L with firmware = 1.05, and the device is accessible on your network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedSince these are end-of-life products receiving no further security updates, replace them with currently supported camera models. If immediate replacement is not feasible, isolate the devices on a restricted VLAN to limit LAN-based attack surface.
Replace with currently supported D-Link camera hardware (e.g., DCS-8300LH, DCS-8526LH, or newer models)
- Note: Both affected products (DCS-932L and DCS-5000L) are end-of-life and no longer supported by D-Link.
- No firmware patches or updates are available for this vulnerability.
- Replace the affected devices with currently supported D-Link camera models that receive security updates.
- If immediate replacement is not possible, isolate affected devices on a separate VLAN restricted from untrusted networks.
- Disable remote access to the device's web interface if not required.
- Monitor D-Link's product support pages periodically for any unexpected firmware releases.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-41504 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-41504 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data