CVE-2021-41555
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn ARCHIBUS Web Central 21.3.3.815 (a version from 2014), XSS occurs in /archibus/dwr/call/plaincall/workflow.runWorkflowRule.dwr because the data received as input from clients is re-included within the HTTP response returned by the application without adequate validation. In this way, if HTML code or client-side executable code (e.g., Javascript) is entered as input, the expected execution flow could be altered. This is fixed in all recent versions, such as version 26. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. Version 21.3 was officially de-supported by the end of 2020
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ARCHIBUS Web Central 21.3.3.815 allows attackers to inject malicious HTML or JavaScript code through the /archibus/dwr/call/plaincall/workflow.runWorkflowRule.dwr endpoint. User-supplied input is returned in the HTTP response without proper validation or encoding, enabling the injected code to execute in victims' browsers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 21.3.3.815CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm ARCHIBUS Web Central installationCheck if the web application is running by accessing the base URL of the server (e.g., http://yourserver/archibus) and look for the ARCHIBUS login page or application interface.Affected if ARCHIBUS Web Central is installed and accessible via web browser
-
Identify installed versionLocate the version information in the application. Typically found in the login page footer, within the help/about section, or by accessing the system management console. Compare against the affected version 21.3.3.815.Affected if Installed version is exactly 21.3.3.815
-
Verify vulnerable endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access the endpoint at /archibus/dwr/call/plaincall/workflow.runWorkflowRule.dwr via HTTP request. A 200 OK response indicates the endpoint exists and may be vulnerable.Affected if The endpoint returns a valid response (status 200) rather than a 404 or access denied error
-
Test for reflected input (optional validation)Send a benign test string (such as a unique identifier like 'TESTXSS123') as a parameter to the vulnerable endpoint and examine if the same string appears unencoded in the HTTP response.Affected if Input is reflected verbatim in the response without HTML encoding or validation
The environment is affected if ARCHIBUS Web Central version 21.3.3.815 is installed and the /archibus/dwr/call/plaincall/workflow.runWorkflowRule.dwr endpoint is accessible and reflects user input without encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to a supported version (version 26 or later). If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement input validation with output encoding at the application layer or deploy a WAF as a compensating control until migration can be completed.
Version 26 (or latest supported release)
- 1. Back up the current ARCHIBUS Web Central 21.3.3.815 installation, database, and configuration files
- 2. Obtain the ARCHIBUS Web Central version 26 (or latest supported version) from the official vendor
- 3. Review the official upgrade/migration documentation for transitioning from version 21.x to version 26
- 4. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment to verify functionality and identify any compatibility issues
- 5. Deploy the upgraded version to production after successful testing
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-41555 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-41555 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data