EftlApplication · Tibco

CVE-2021-43055

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-01-11
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 6.7.2 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The eFTL Server component of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO eFTL - Community Edition, TIBCO eFTL - Developer Edition, and TIBCO eFTL - Enterprise Edition contains an easily exploitable vulnerability that allows clients to inherit the permissions of the client that initially connected on the affected system. Affected releases are TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO eFTL - Community Edition: versions 6.7.2 and below, TIBCO eFTL - Developer Edition: versions 6.7.2 and below, and TIBCO eFTL - Enterprise Edition: versions 6.7.2 and below.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The eFTL Server component has a broken access control vulnerability where clients inherit permissions from the initially connected client rather than authenticating with their own distinct permissions. This allows unauthorized privilege escalation where subsequent clients gain the authorization context of the first client to connect.

MitigationUpgrade TIBCO eFTL to a version above 6.7.2. Review and validate client authorization configurations post-upgrade to ensure proper permission isolation between clients.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
EftlApplication
Affected:<= 6.7.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate eFTL installation directory
    Check common installation paths such as /opt/tibco/eftl/, C:\Program Files\TIBCO\eftl\, or /usr/local/tibco/eftl/. Also check for environment variable TIBCO_EFTL_HOME if defined.
    Affected if eFTL software is present on the system
  2. Identify installed eFTL version
    Locate the version file or executable within the eFTL installation. Common locations include: version.txt in the root directory, or run 'eftlserver --version' if the binary is accessible. Check the lib directory for JAR files containing version metadata.
    Affected if Installed version is 6.7.2 or lower
  3. Verify eFTL server is running
    Check for running processes: on Linux use 'ps aux | grep eftl', on Windows use Task Manager or 'wmic process where "name like '%eftl%'"'. Also check if port 9191 (default eFTL port) is listening using 'netstat -an | grep 9191'.
    Affected if eFTL server process is active and listening on network ports
  4. Check client connection configurations
    Review eFTL client application configurations and code that establishes connections to the eFTL server. Look for patterns where multiple client applications connect to the same eFTL server instance without re-authenticating or with shared credential contexts.
    Affected if Multiple client applications connect to the same eFTL server using inherited session context

You are affected if TIBCO eFTL version 6.7.2 or lower is installed and running, and multiple clients can connect to inherit the authorization context of the first connected client.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 6.7.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade TIBCO eFTL to a version above 6.7.2. Review and validate client authorization configurations post-upgrade to ensure proper permission isolation between clients.

Fix this in Eftl Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-43055 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-43055 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data