CVE-2021-43067
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator version 6.4.0, version 6.3.2 and below, version 6.2.1 and below, version 6.1.2 and below, version 6.0.7 to 6.0.1 allows attacker to duplicate a target LDAP user 2 factors authentication token via crafted HTTP requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiAuthenticator versions 6.4.0 through 6.0.1 contain an information disclosure vulnerability where crafted HTTP requests allow unauthenticated attackers to duplicate LDAP users' 2-factor authentication tokens. This enables unauthorized replication of sensitive 2FA credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.1, <= 6.0.7= 6.1.0= 6.1.1= 6.1.2= 6.2.0= 6.2.1= 6.3.0= 6.3.1= 6.3.2= 6.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiAuthenticator installationLocate the FortiAuthenticator system on your network. This is typically a dedicated appliance or virtual machine. Confirm the device hostname and management IP address.Affected if FortiAuthenticator is present and accessible on the network
-
Determine installed FortiAuthenticator versionLog into the FortiAuthenticator web GUI or CLI and navigate to System > Dashboard > System Information widget, or run 'get system status' via CLI to retrieve the firmware version.Affected if The version falls within 6.0.1 through 6.0.7, or is exactly 6.1.0, 6.1.1, 6.1.2, 6.2.0, 6.2.1, 6.3.0, 6.3.1, 6.3.2, or 6.4.0
-
Verify LDAP user synchronization is enabledIn the FortiAuthenticator GUI, go to LDAP Users > LDAP Users and confirm at least one LDAP directory is configured and users are being synchronized. Alternatively, check via CLI with 'show user ldap'.Affected if LDAP directories are configured and LDAP users exist in the system
-
Confirm 2FA is configured for LDAP usersNavigate to Authentication > User Management > LDAP Users and verify that two-factor authentication is enabled for the LDAP users or LDAP user groups. Check the 2FA method configured (FortiToken, email, SMS, etc.).Affected if Two-factor authentication is enforced for LDAP synchronized users
-
Inspect HTTP access logs for unusual requestsIn the FortiAuthenticator GUI, go to Log & Report > Event Log > Authentication and search for duplicate or repeated authentication attempts targeting LDAP user endpoints. Look for unauthenticated requests to endpoints like /mfa/ or /api/v1/mfa/.Affected if Unauthenticated or anomalous HTTP requests targeting MFA/token endpoints appear in logs
Your environment is affected if FortiAuthenticator versions 6.0.1 through 6.4.0 are running with LDAP user synchronization and 2FA enabled for those LDAP users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade FortiAuthenticator to the vendor patched version. Prioritize remediation given the CVSS 6.5 score and the exposure of 2FA tokens enabling potential account takeover.
FortiAuthenticator 6.4.0 or later
- 1. Back up the FortiAuthenticator configuration before proceeding with any upgrade.
- 2. Review the FortiAuthenticator upgrade guide and release notes for version 6.4.0 or later.
- 3. Plan for maintenance window as the upgrade may require downtime.
- 4. Download the FortiAuthenticator firmware version 6.4.0 or later from the Fortinet support portal.
- 5. Upload and install the firmware upgrade following Fortinet's standard upgrade procedures.
- 6. After upgrade, verify that LDAP user 2-factor authentication functionality is working correctly.
- 7. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by reviewing system logs and testing the 2FA token duplication scenario.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-43067 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-43067 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data