CVE-2021-43391
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability exists when reading a DXF file using Open Design Alliance Drawings SDK before 2022.11. The specific issue exists within the parsing of DXF files. Crafted data in a DXF file (an invalid dash counter in line types) can trigger a read past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in Open Design Alliance Drawings SDK versions prior to 2022.11 when parsing DXF files. The specific issue occurs during parsing of DXF line types where an invalid dash counter causes the parser to read beyond the boundaries of an allocated buffer. This memory access violation can potentially be exploited to achieve code execution in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2022.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if ODA Drawings SDK is in useSearch for files named OdDb.dll, OdDxf.dll, or other ODA SDK DLLs in your application directory and system paths. Check application dependencies or manifests that reference Open Design Alliance libraries.Affected if The ODA Drawings SDK DLLs are present in the environment
-
Determine the installed SDK versionLocate the ODA SDK DLL files and check their version properties (right-click > Properties > Details > File Version). Alternatively, check the product version information embedded in the SDK libraries or check your application's dependency documentation.Affected if The version is earlier than 2022.11 (e.g., 2022.10, 2022, 2021.x, etc.)
-
Verify DXF file processing is enabledExamine application configuration files or settings that control file format support. Look for options enabling DXF import, read, or parsing functionality.Affected if DXF file processing is enabled and the application can load DXF files
-
Confirm line type parsing is activeReview application logs or debug output during DXF file loading. Check if line type entities (LTYPE) in DXF files are being processed by the SDK.Affected if Line type parsing from DXF files is performed by the application
-
Check for DXF file input handlingIdentify how DXF files enter the system: user uploads, file import features, automated processing pipelines, or API endpoints that accept DXF input.Affected if The application accepts and processes DXF files from external sources
You are affected if the ODA Drawings SDK version is earlier than 2022.11 and your application parses DXF files with line type data enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2022.11
Upgrade to ODA Drawings SDK version 2022.11 or later to obtain the patch. Additionally, implement input validation on DXF files before processing and consider sandboxing file parsing operations to limit the impact of exploitation.
Drawings SDK version 2022.11
- 1. Identify all deployed instances of Open Design Alliance Drawings SDK in your environment
- 2. Verify the currently installed version of the Drawings SDK
- 3. Download Drawings SDK version 2022.11 or later from the official Open Design Alliance website (www.opendesign.com)
- 4. Test the new SDK version in a staging environment to ensure compatibility with your application
- 5. Deploy the upgraded SDK to production environments
- 6. Ensure DXF file processing continues to function correctly after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-43391 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-43391 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data