ServerApplication · Onlyoffice

CVE-2021-43449

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-01-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 7.0.0.49 or later.
See remediation →
88/100
Remediation priority · High
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
ONLYOFFICE all versions as of 2021-11-08 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The document editor service can be abused to read and serve arbitrary URLs as a document.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis
How this class of weakness works · CWE-918

The server can be induced to make requests to a URL an attacker controls, turning it into a proxy into internal networks and cloud metadata services. It's especially dangerous behind a trusted network boundary. The fix is strict allow-listing of destinations and blocking access to internal address ranges.

General guidance for the server-side request forgery (ssrf) class — the official description and references above are authoritative for this specific CVE. Want a bespoke review and a reviewed fix? Ask our team →

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ServerApplication
Affected:<= 7.0.0.49

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 7.0.0.49
Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Upgrade to a version newer than 7.0.0.49 (consult official ONLYOFFICE release notes for the specific fixed release)

  1. Identify the current ONLYOFFICE Server version installed using the control panel or command line interface
  2. Consult the official ONLYOFFICE release notes or security advisories at onlyoffice.com to identify the first version containing the SSRF fix
  3. Upgrade to the fixed version (refer to official ONLYOFFICE release documentation for the specific version number that addresses CVE-2021-43449)
  4. After upgrade, verify the SSRF vulnerability is resolved by testing that arbitrary external URLs can no longer be loaded through the document editor service
  5. Review ONLYOFFICE configuration to ensure document conversion settings restrict allowed sources to trusted domains only
Caveat Review release notes for any breaking changes between current version and target version before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can identify the exact fixed release, upgrade, and verify it in staging — typical engagement from $3,200. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-43449 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-43449 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data