CVE-2021-43939
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedElcomplus SmartPTT is vulnerable when a low-authenticated user can access higher level administration authorization by issuing requests directly to the desired endpoints.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceElcomplus SmartPTT contains an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability allowing authenticated users with low-level privileges to bypass authorization controls and access administrative functions by directly requesting higher-privilege endpoints. This represents a vertical privilege escalation where a low-authenticated user can obtain administrative access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SmartPTT SCADA installationCheck for SmartPTT SCADA software on the system by looking in installed programs, application directories, or running services related to SmartPTTAffected if SmartPTT SCADA version 1.1 is installed on the system
-
Verify installed versionAccess the SmartPTT SCADA application or check system inventory to confirm the exact version number installedAffected if The installed version is exactly 1.1
-
Confirm user authentication is enabledCheck if user authentication is required to access SmartPTT SCADA by attempting to log in or reviewing authentication configuration settingsAffected if User authentication is required and users can log in with low-level privileges
-
Check for multiple user privilege rolesReview user management settings or role configuration within SmartPTT SCADA to confirm multiple privilege levels exist (administrator, operator, viewer, etc.)Affected if The system has defined multiple user roles with different privilege levels
-
Test for IDOR on admin endpointsUsing a low-privilege authenticated account, attempt to directly request administrative endpoints or functions by modifying request parameters or URLs to access higher-privilege featuresAffected if Low-privilege users can access administrative functions by directly requesting protected endpoints
A user is affected if SmartPTT SCADA version 1.1 is installed, user authentication is enabled with multiple privilege roles, and low-privilege authenticated users can directly access administrative endpoints without proper authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement proper role-based access control (RBAC) checks on all server-side endpoints and verify user privileges before executing any action, regardless of whether the user directly requests a protected resource.
Latest available SmartPTT SCADA release (contact vendor for specific version number)
- Contact Elcomplus technical support to obtain the latest patched version of SmartPTT SCADA
- Request information about security updates addressing CVE-2021-43939 and authorization bypass vulnerabilities
- Apply the vendor-provided patch or upgrade to the fixed release
- Verify that low-privilege users can no longer access admin endpoints after the update
- Review user role configurations and ensure proper authorization controls are in place
- Test all administrative functions with different privilege levels to confirm the fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-43939 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-43939 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data