CVE-2021-44207
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAcclaim USAHERDS through 7.4.0.1 uses hard-coded credentials.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAcclaim USAHERDS through version 7.4.0.1 contains hard-coded credentials embedded in the application code or configuration. These credentials can be discovered through code analysis, reverse engineering, or by gaining filesystem access, potentially allowing unauthorized access to the system or its backend services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.4.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of Acclaim USAHERDSLocate the application version information in the software itself, typically found in the About section, a version file, or the main application metadataAffected if The installed version is 7.4.0.1 or any earlier version (7.4.0.1, 7.4.0, 7.3.x, etc.)
-
Inspect source code repositories for hardcoded credentialsIf you have access to the application source code, search all source files (such as .java, .cs, .js, .php, .py) for hardcoded password strings, API keys, encryption keys, or secret tokens using patterns like 'password=', 'apiKey=', 'secret=', 'key=' assigned to string literalsAffected if Any hardcoded credentials are found embedded directly in source code files
-
Examine configuration files for embedded credentialsReview all configuration files (such as .xml, .json, .properties, .yml, .config, .ini) for plaintext passwords, API keys, or secrets stored in connection strings, app settings, or service configurationsAffected if Credentials are found stored in plaintext within configuration files
-
Search for encrypted or encoded credentialsLook for Base64-encoded strings, encrypted values, or obfuscated content in both source code and configuration files that may represent hardcoded credentials or keysAffected if Encoded or encrypted credentials are found embedded in the codebase or config files
A user is affected if they are running Acclaim USAHERDS version 7.4.0.1 or earlier, or if hardcoded credentials are found anywhere in the application source code or configuration files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace all hard-coded credentials with secure, dynamic credential management such as environment variables, a secrets manager, or proper authentication mechanisms. Rotate any credentials that may have been exposed and audit the codebase for additional hard-coded secrets.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-44207 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-44207 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data