Jt Open ToolkitApplication · Siemens

CVE-2021-44440

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-12-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 11.1.1.0 / 13.1.1.0 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability has been identified in JT Utilities (All versions < V13.1.1.0), JTTK (All versions < V11.1.1.0). JTTK library in affected products is vulnerable to memory corruption condition while parsing specially crafted JT files. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-14912)

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Memory corruption vulnerability in the JTTK library when parsing specially crafted JT files. Attackers can exploit this to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process by enticing users to open malicious JT files.

MitigationUpdate JT Utilities to V13.1.1.0 or later and JTTK to V11.1.1.0 or later. Implement file validation and sandboxing for untrusted JT files.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Jt Open ToolkitApplication
Affected:< 11.1.1.0
Jt UtilitiesApplication
Affected:< 13.1.1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify JTTK installation and version
    Locate the Siemens Jt Open Toolkit installation directory and check the version metadata (JAR manifest, DLL properties, or product About information)
    Affected if The installed JTTK version is below 11.1.1.0
  2. Identify JT Utilities installation and version
    Locate the Siemens JT Utilities installation and retrieve the version from the product information or executable metadata
    Affected if The installed JT Utilities version is below 13.1.1.0
  3. Confirm JT file parsing is enabled
    Determine whether the affected system uses JTTK or JT Utilities to parse JT files, either through application integration or command-line tools
    Affected if The environment processes JT files using a vulnerable version of the library
  4. Inspect library file version
    Examine the core JTTK library files (typically named jtopen*.jar or similar) present in the installation for explicit version numbers
    Affected if The library version cannot be verified as 11.1.1.0 or later

If either JTTK is below version 11.1.1.0 or JT Utilities is below version 13.1.1.0 and the environment parses JT files, the system is affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 11.1.1.0 / 13.1.1.0 or later
Fixed in 11.1.1.013.1.1.0
Interim mitigation

Update JT Utilities to V13.1.1.0 or later and JTTK to V11.1.1.0 or later. Implement file validation and sandboxing for untrusted JT files.

Recommended fix High confidence

Jt Open Toolkit (JTTK) >= 11.1.1.0; JT Utilities >= 13.1.1.0

  1. Identify whether Jt Open Toolkit (JTTK) or JT Utilities is in use, and determine the current installed version
  2. Download the fixed version: JTTK version 11.1.1.0 or later, JT Utilities version 13.1.1.0 or later from the official Siemens cert-portal or product distribution channel
  3. Install the updated version following standard installation procedures
  4. Verify the installed version matches the fixed release (>= 11.1.1.0 for JTTK or >= 13.1.1.0 for JT Utilities)

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Jt Open Toolkit Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,760
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-44440 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-44440 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data