Jt Open ToolkitApplication · Siemens

CVE-2021-44442

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-12-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 11.1.1.0 / 13.1.1.0 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability has been identified in JT Utilities (All versions < V13.1.1.0), JTTK (All versions < V11.1.1.0). JTTK library in affected products contains an out of bounds write past the fixed-length heap-based buffer while parsing specially crafted JT files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-14995)

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Heap-based buffer overflow in JTTK library during JT file parsing. The parser writes beyond the boundaries of a fixed-length heap buffer when processing specially crafted JT files, allowing arbitrary code execution in the current process context.

MitigationUpgrade JTTK to version 11.1.1.0 or later, and JT Utilities to version 13.1.1.0 or later to patch the vulnerable parsing code.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Jt Open ToolkitApplication
Affected:< 11.1.1.0
Jt UtilitiesApplication
Affected:< 13.1.1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Jt Open Toolkit version
    Locate the Jt Open Toolkit installation directory (commonly in Program Files/Siemens or within the application's runtime path) and check the version information in the product's about dialog, version.txt, or library manifest file. On Windows, also check Add/Remove Programs for the installed version.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 11.1.1.0
  2. Check JT Utilities version
    Locate the Siemens JT Utilities installation (typically in Program Files/Siemens/JT_Utilities or similar). Retrieve the version from the application's executable properties, version info file, or installation metadata in the Windows registry.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 13.1.1.0
  3. Identify active JT parsing usage
    Review application logs, processes, or configurations that invoke the JTTK library for JT file parsing. Check for any automated batch processes, viewer applications, or data conversion tools that load jtkit.dll or similar JTTK components.
    Affected if The product is actively used to parse JT files with versions below the fixed releases

You are affected if either Siemens Jt Open Toolkit below 11.1.1.0 or Siemens JT Utilities below 13.1.1.0 is installed and used for JT file parsing.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 11.1.1.0 / 13.1.1.0 or later
Fixed in 11.1.1.013.1.1.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade JTTK to version 11.1.1.0 or later, and JT Utilities to version 13.1.1.0 or later to patch the vulnerable parsing code.

Recommended fix High confidence

Jt Open Toolkit 11.1.1.0 or later; Jt Utilities 13.1.1.0 or later

  1. 1. Identify which affected product(s) are in use: Jt Open Toolkit (JTTK) and/or Jt Utilities
  2. 2. Determine current installed version of the relevant product(s)
  3. 3. For Jt Open Toolkit: upgrade to version 11.1.1.0 or later
  4. 4. For Jt Utilities: upgrade to version 13.1.1.0 or later
  5. 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version
  6. 6. Re-scan or re-test any systems that process JT files to confirm the vulnerability is remediated

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Jt Open Toolkit Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,720
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-44442 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-44442 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data