CVE-2021-44519
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Citrix XenMobile Server through 10.12 RP9, there is an Authenticated Directory Traversal vulnerability, leading to remote code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an authenticated directory traversal vulnerability in Citrix XenMobile Server (versions up to 10.12 RP9). An authenticated attacker can manipulate file path inputs to escape restricted directories and access unauthorized filesystem locations, which can be chained to achieve remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.13.0= 10.14.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Citrix XenMobile Server is installedLocate the XenMobile Server installation by checking for the typical installation directory structure or by querying running services for 'XenMobile' or 'Citrix' processes on the host.Affected if The product is not present on the system.
-
Determine the installed XenMobile Server versionAccess the management console or check the version information file within the XenMobile installation directory. The version is typically displayed in the admin UI or obtainable via command line tools included with the product.Affected if The installed version is 10.13.0 or 10.14.0.
-
Verify management interface accessibilityCheck if the XenMobile management web interface (typically ports 8443 or 443) is exposed to the network. This can be done by reviewing firewall rules, reverse proxy configurations, or performing a port scan of the server.Affected if The management interface is accessible from untrusted networks.
-
Confirm authentication is enabled for the management interfaceReview the authentication configuration in the XenMobile admin console to ensure user accounts exist and authentication is required for accessing management functions.Affected if The management interface permits unauthenticated access to file path parameters.
-
Identify any user accounts with access to file upload or path parametersReview the list of user roles and permissions in the XenMobile admin console, focusing on accounts that have access to features involving file paths or uploads.Affected if Low-privilege or compromised user accounts can manipulate file path inputs.
A user is affected if Citrix XenMobile Server is installed and the version is 10.13.0 or 10.14.0, with the management interface accessible and authentication configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch for Citrix XenMobile Server to a version beyond 10.12 RP9. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network access to the management interface to trusted IPs and review user access controls.
XenMobile Server 10.13 RP1+ or 10.14 RP1+ (latest available Rollup Patch for respective track)
- 1. Identify the current XenMobile Server version by checking the /opt/zenserver/bin/zenserver --version or through the XenMobile console under Dashboard > Server > Version
- 2. Download the latest XenMobile Server security patch or update from the Citrix download portal (download.citrix.com) - search for XenMobile Server 10.13 or 10.14 latest Rollup Patch (RP)
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window as the update may require server downtime
- 4. Back up the XenMobile Server configuration and database before applying the update
- 5. Apply the security update following Citrix documentation: typically via the XenMobile Server console under Support > Updates > Check for Updates, or by manually uploading the patch via the same interface
- 6. After update installation, verify the server status is healthy and all services are running
- 7. Confirm the version now shows a patch level beyond the vulnerable versions (e.g., 10.13 RP1 or later, 10.14 RP1 or later)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-44519 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-44519 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data