Information ExposureWeakness · CWE-200

CVE-2021-44534

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Insufficient user input filtering leads to arbitrary file read by non-authenticated attacker, which results in sensitive information disclosure.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a path traversal vulnerability where insufficient input filtering on user-supplied data allows unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary files on the server, potentially exposing sensitive configuration files, credentials, or other confidential data.

MitigationImplement strict input validation using allowlists, sanitize path traversal sequences (../), and use secure file access APIs that prevent directory traversal. Additionally, enforce proper authentication and authorization checks on all file access endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify file-handling components
    Review your application's codebase or configuration for endpoints, functions, or APIs that accept user-supplied file paths or filenames. Look for parameters that reference files, such as 'file', 'path', 'filename', 'include', or similar. Search for usage of file reading functions that take user input.
    Affected if The application processes user-supplied paths to read or include files from the server filesystem.
  2. Verify authentication on file access endpoints
    Inspect your access control configuration and test file-related endpoints without providing credentials. Check if unauthenticated requests to file access functionality are accepted or rejected.
    Affected if File access endpoints are accessible without authentication.
  3. Test for path traversal injection
    Send requests to file-handling endpoints containing path traversal sequences such as '../' or '..\' in parameters. Compare your application's behavior to expected normal operation. Review server access logs for attempts containing these sequences.
    Affected if The application returns files outside the intended directory when traversal sequences are supplied.
  4. Check input filtering implementation
    Examine the code or configuration handling file path parameters. Look for explicit validation, allowlisting, or sanitization of '../' sequences before file operations occur.
    Affected if No input validation or path traversal filtering is implemented on file path parameters.
  5. Review file access permissions
    Verify that the application process runs with minimal filesystem permissions. Check which directories and files the service account can access. Ensure sensitive files are not readable by the application process.
    Affected if The application runs with elevated privileges and can access sensitive system or configuration files.

Your environment is affected if unauthenticated users can supply file path parameters to your application and retrieve files outside the intended directory due to missing input validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation using allowlists, sanitize path traversal sequences (../), and use secure file access APIs that prevent directory traversal. Additionally, enforce proper authentication and authorization checks on all file access endpoints.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-44534 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-44534 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data