CVE-2021-44793
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSingle Connect does not perform an authorization check when using the sc-reports-ui" module. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access the device configuration page and export the data to an external file. The exploitation of this vulnerability might allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information including the database credentials. Since the database runs with high privileges it is possible to execute commands with the attained credentials.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCVE-2021-44793 is an authorization bypass vulnerability in the sc-reports-ui module of Single Connect. A remote attacker can access the device configuration page and export data without authentication, potentially exposing database credentials. Since the database runs with high privileges, attackers can execute commands with the attained credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.16CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Single Connect installationLocate the Single Connect application on the system or check the product version via the system's package manager, software inventory, or administrative interfaceAffected if Single Connect is installed and the version is unknown or less than 2.16
-
Determine Single Connect versionAccess the administrative console, check the software manifest, or use the vendor-provided version query mechanism to obtain the exact installed version numberAffected if The installed version is lower than 2.16 (e.g., 2.15.x, 2.14.x, etc.)
-
Verify sc-reports-ui module exposureCheck the web server configuration or application modules list to confirm whether the sc-reports-ui component is loaded and accessibleAffected if The sc-reports-ui module is present and enabled on the system
-
Test unauthenticated access to configuration pagesAttempt to access the device configuration page or data export endpoints via HTTP/HTTPS requests without providing credentialsAffected if The configuration page or export functions are accessible without authentication (HTTP response returns 200 OK instead of redirecting to login)
-
Check network accessibility of sc-reports-uiReview firewall rules, network ACLs, or access control lists to determine if the sc-reports-ui interface is exposed to untrusted networks or the internetAffected if The sc-reports-ui interface is reachable from untrusted networks or the internet without restriction
A system is affected if it runs Krontech Single Connect with version lower than 2.16 and has the sc-reports-ui module exposed to network access where unauthenticated configuration or data export is possible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.16
Apply vendor patches for Single Connect immediately. If no patch is available, implement compensating controls such as network segmentation, firewall rules restricting access to the sc-reports-ui interface, and multi-factor authentication for administrative interfaces.
2.16
- Backup the current Single Connect configuration and database before initiating the upgrade
- Obtain Single Connect version 2.16 or later from the official vendor distribution channel
- Apply the upgrade to the Single Connect instance following the standard upgrade procedure
- After upgrade, verify that the sc-reports-ui module now performs proper authorization checks
- Confirm the configuration page is no longer accessible without authentication
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-44793 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-44793 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data