Incorrect Permission AssignmentWeakness · CWE-732

CVE-2021-4480

HIGH · 8.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
85/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Dräger Protector Software prior to version 6.4.2 contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability due to insecure file system permissions that allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges. Attackers can replace binaries or loaded modules on the host system to execute code with NT SYSTEM privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Dräger Protector Software versions prior to 6.4.2 have insecure file system permissions on the installation directory, allowing local attackers to modify or replace executable binaries and DLLs. Since the software runs with NT SYSTEM privileges, a local user can inject malicious code by overwriting these files and execute with highest-level Windows privileges.

MitigationUpgrade Dräger Protector Software to version 6.4.2 or later. As a compensating control, review and restrict file system permissions on the software installation directory to prevent unauthorized modification by non-admin users.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Dräger Protector Software is installed
    Check Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for Dräger Protector entry, or look for the software in Add/Remove Programs
    Affected if The software is found installed on the system
  2. Determine installed version
    Locate the installation directory (typically under C:\Program Files\Dräger or C:\Program Files (x86)\Dräger) and check the version info of the main executable, or query the registry uninstall key for the version string
    Affected if Installed version is lower than 6.4.2 or version cannot be determined
  3. Identify executable and module locations
    In the Dräger Protector installation directory, list all .exe, .dll, and other binary files that the application loads or executes
    Affected if Executable or module files exist in a world-writable location or directory with weak permissions
  4. Check file system permissions on binaries
    Use icacls or Get-Acl PowerShell cmdlet to inspect permissions on each binary in the Dräger Protector installation folder. Look for grant entries allowing Write or Modify access to non-admin users or the Users group
    Affected if Any executable, DLL, or loaded module grants Write or Modify permissions to standard users or non-privileged accounts
  5. Check for replaceable binaries in service paths
    Examine the service configuration using sc qc or Get-Service to see if Dräger Protector runs as a Windows service, then verify the binary path and any dependent DLLs are not writable by low-privilege users
    Affected if The service runs with elevated privileges (NT SYSTEM) and its binaries are writable by non-admin users

User is affected if Dräger Protector Software is installed with a version prior to 6.4.2 AND file system permissions on binaries or loaded modules allow modification by non-privileged local users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Dräger Protector Software to version 6.4.2 or later. As a compensating control, review and restrict file system permissions on the software installation directory to prevent unauthorized modification by non-admin users.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,210
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-4480 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-4480 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data