Derive Com ImplApplication · Derive Com Impl Project

CVE-2021-45681

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-12-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.1.2 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in the derive-com-impl crate before 0.1.2 for Rust. An invalid reference (and memory corruption) can occur because AddRef might not be called before returning a pointer.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A COM reference counting bug in the derive-com-impl Rust crate (versions before 0.1.2) where the generated code fails to call AddRef before returning a pointer. This causes incorrect reference counts, potentially leading to use-after-free or memory corruption when objects are prematurely freed while still in use by callers.

MitigationUpdate the derive-com-impl crate to version 0.1.2 or later which includes the fix for proper AddRef calls before pointer return.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Derive Com ImplApplication
Affected:< 0.1.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate derive-com-impl in project dependencies
    Search your project's Cargo.toml file for 'derive-com-impl' under the [dependencies] or [dev-dependencies] section, or search Cargo.lock for 'derive-com-impl'
    Affected if The crate is listed as a direct or transitive dependency
  2. Identify the installed version
    Check the version number next to derive-com-impl in Cargo.lock, or run 'cargo tree -p derive-com-impl' to see the resolved version
    Affected if The version is less than 0.1.2 (e.g., 0.1.0, 0.1.1, or any version starting with 0.0.x)
  3. Verify COM interface generation is used
    Search your codebase for uses of #[derive(ComInterface)] or similar COM-related derive macros that would invoke the affected crate
    Affected if Your project generates COM interface implementations using this crate
  4. Inspect generated code for AddRef calls
    Build your project with 'cargo expand' or examine the target directory for the expanded Rust code of COM interface implementations, looking for methods that return interface pointers without calling AddRef first
    Affected if Generated interface methods return raw pointers without preceding AddRef calls, indicating the bug is present

You are affected if your project uses the derive-com-impl crate at a version below 0.1.2 and generates COM interface code that returns pointers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.1.2 or later
Fixed in 0.1.2
Interim mitigation

Update the derive-com-impl crate to version 0.1.2 or later which includes the fix for proper AddRef calls before pointer return.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

0.1.2

  1. Locate the derive-com-impl dependency in your Cargo.toml file
  2. Update the version specification for derive-com-impl to version 0.1.2 or later (e.g., derive-com-impl = "0.1.2")
  3. Run `cargo update derive-com-impl` or `cargo build` to fetch and compile the fixed version
  4. Verify the update was successful by checking `cargo tree | grep derive-com-impl`
Caveat Review the crate's changelog or release notes for any API changes between your current version and 0.1.2

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Derive Com Impl Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,800
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-45681 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-45681 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data