NixApplication · Nix Project

CVE-2021-45707

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-12-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.20.2 / 0.21.2 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in the nix crate 0.16.0 and later before 0.20.2, 0.21.x before 0.21.2, and 0.22.x before 0.22.2 for Rust. unistd::getgrouplist has an out-of-bounds write if a user is in more than 16 /etc/groups groups.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The nix crate for Rust contains a heap-based out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the unistd::getgrouplist function. When a user belongs to more than 16 groups in /etc/groups, the function writes beyond the allocated buffer boundary, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution.

MitigationUpgrade the nix crate to version 0.20.2, 0.21.2, 0.22.2 or later to patch the out-of-bounds write in getgrouplist. Alternatively, audit code to ensure getgrouplist is not called with insufficient buffer allocation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
NixApplication
Affected:>= 0.16.0, < 0.20.2>= 0.21.0, < 0.21.2>= 0.22.0, < 0.22.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify nix crate as a dependency
    Search for the nix crate in your project's Cargo.toml file or check Cargo.lock for nix entries
    Affected if The nix crate is listed as a dependency in your project
  2. Check installed nix crate version
    Run `cargo tree -p nix` or inspect the version specified in Cargo.lock under the nix crate entry
    Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: >= 0.16.0 and < 0.20.2, or >= 0.21.0 and < 0.21.2, or >= 0.22.0 and < 0.22.2
  3. Verify getgrouplist function is used
    Search your source code for calls to getgrouplist, or grep for `getgrouplist` across your project files
    Affected if Your code calls the getgrouplist function from the nix crate
  4. Check user group membership count
    Run `id` or `groups` command for the user who runs the application, or check /etc/group to count how many groups the user belongs to
    Affected if The user running the application belongs to more than 16 groups and uses vulnerable code paths

You are affected if the nix crate is a dependency with a vulnerable version (0.16.0 to <0.20.2, 0.21.0 to <0.21.2, or 0.22.0 to <0.22.2), your code calls getgrouplist, and the application runs with a user in more than 16 groups.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.20.2 / 0.21.2 / 0.22.2 or later
Fixed in 0.20.20.21.20.22.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the nix crate to version 0.20.2, 0.21.2, 0.22.2 or later to patch the out-of-bounds write in getgrouplist. Alternatively, audit code to ensure getgrouplist is not called with insufficient buffer allocation.

Recommended fix High confidence

nix crate version 0.22.2 (or 0.21.2 / 0.20.2)

  1. Update the nix crate dependency in your Cargo.toml file to version 0.20.2, 0.21.2, or 0.22.2
  2. Run cargo update or cargo build to fetch the patched version
  3. Verify the update was applied correctly using cargo tree | grep nix
Caveat Review the nix crate changelog for any breaking changes between your current version and the target patched version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Nix Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-45707 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-45707 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data