CVE-2021-45917
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe server-request receiver function of Shockwall system has an improper authentication vulnerability. An authenticated attacker of an agent computer within the local area network can use the local registry information to launch server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on another agent computer, resulting in arbitrary code execution for controlling the system or disrupting service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Shockwall server-request receiver function contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows an authenticated attacker on a LAN agent computer to leverage local registry information to perform SSRF attacks against other agent computers, leading to arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.20.0401CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Sun Moon Jingyao Network Computer Terminal Protection System is installedCheck system for presence of the Sun Moon Jingyao Network Computer Terminal Protection System software or serviceAffected if The product is not installed or has been removed, the system is not affected; if installed, continue to version check
-
Check the installed firmware versionLocate the version information for the Sun Moon Jingyao Network Computer Terminal Protection System and compare it against 7.20.0401Affected if The installed version is lower than 7.20.0401 (for example, 7.20.0300 or any version below 7.20.0401), the vulnerability is present
-
Verify if the server-request receiver function is enabledInspect the system configuration or service settings to determine whether the server-request receiver function is active and accessibleAffected if The server-request receiver function is enabled and exposed, the attack surface exists for exploitation
-
Check agent process registry access permissionsExamine registry key permissions for the agent processes to determine if they allow unrestricted access from authenticated local usersAffected if Registry access permissions are not properly restricted, an authenticated attacker could leverage registry information for SSRF attacks
A system is affected if it runs Sun Moon Jingyao Network Computer Terminal Protection System with firmware version below 7.20.0401, has the server-request receiver function enabled, and contains misconfigured registry permissions that permit authenticated local users to access agent registry data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.20.0401
Implement proper authentication validation and authorization checks in the server-request receiver function, add SSRF protections, and restrict registry access permissions for agent processes.
Firmware version 7.20.0401 or later
- Identify the current firmware version of the Network Computer Terminal Protection System (Shockwall)
- Download the updated firmware version 7.20.0401 or later from the official vendor source
- Review the vendor's firmware upgrade instructions and ensure proper backup of current configuration
- Upload and install the firmware update through the system's administrative interface
- Verify the firmware was successfully applied by checking the version number
- Restart the system if required by the upgrade procedure
- Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by verifying the server-request receiver function now properly authenticates requests
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-45917 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-45917 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data