CVE-2021-45977
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJetBrains IntelliJ IDEA 2021.3.1 Preview, IntelliJ IDEA 2021.3.1 RC, PyCharm Professional 2021.3.1 RC, GoLand 2021.3.1, PhpStorm 2021.3.1 Preview, PhpStorm 2021.3.1 RC, RubyMine 2021.3.1 Preview, RubyMine 2021.3.1 RC, CLion 2021.3.1, WebStorm 2021.3.1 Preview, and WebStorm 2021.3.1 RC (used as Remote Development backend IDEs) bind to the 0.0.0.0 IP address. The fixed versions are: IntelliJ IDEA 2021.3.1, PyCharm Professional 2021.3.1, GoLand 2021.3.2, PhpStorm 2021.3.1 (213.6461.83), RubyMine 2021.3.1, CLion 2021.3.2, and WebStorm 2021.3.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm Professional, GoLand, PhpStorm, RubyMine, CLion, WebStorm) used as Remote Development backends bind to 0.0.0.0 instead of localhost, exposing the IDE's network services to all network interfaces. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to access the IDE from any network source.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2021.3.1= 2021.3.1= 2021.3.1= 2021.3.1= 2021.3.1= 2021.3.1= 2021.3.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed JetBrains IDE versionOpen the IDE and go to Help > About, or check the application metadata. For command line, run: ls -la /opt/JetBrains/<ProductName> or on Windows check Program Files/JetBrains/<ProductName>Affected if The installed version matches 2021.3.1 for any of: Clion, Goland, IntelliJ Idea, Phpstorm, Pycharm, Rubymine, or Webstorm
-
Determine if Remote Development mode is activeLook for running JetBrains Gateway client, remote backend processes, or check for IDE backend services listening on network ports (typically 63342-63399 range). On Linux, run: netstat -tlnp | grep -i jetbrains or ss -tlnp | grep -i jetbrainsAffected if The IDE is configured to act as a Remote Development backend and is actively running as such
-
Verify network binding addressUse netstat or ss to inspect which address the IDE backend service is listening on. Run: netstat -tlnp (Linux) or netstat -an (Windows) and look for the IDE process listening on 0.0.0.0 rather than 127.0.0.1Affected if The IDE backend service is bound to 0.0.0.0, making it accessible from all network interfaces rather than localhost only
A user is affected if they are running any of the listed JetBrains IDEs at version 2021.3.1 with Remote Development/Gateway backend enabled, and the service is exposed on 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to the fixed versions (IntelliJ IDEA 2021.3.1, PyCharm Professional 2021.3.1, GoLand 2021.3.2, PhpStorm 2021.3.1 (213.6461.83), RubyMine 2021.3.1, CLion 2021.3.2, WebStorm 2021.3.1) or implement network access controls/firewall rules to restrict access to the IDE services.
GoLand 2021.3.2, CLion 2021.3.2, or full 2021.3.1 release for other IDEs (not RC/Preview)
- 1. Open your JetBrains IDE (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm Professional, GoLand, PhpStorm, RubyMine, CLion, or WebStorm)
- 2. Go to Help > About to check your current version (if it shows 2021.3.1 RC, Preview, or 2021.3.1 with older build number, you are affected)
- 3. Download the fixed version for your specific IDE from jetbrains.com: GoLand 2021.3.2, CLion 2021.3.2, or the full 2021.3.1 release (not RC/Preview) for IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm Professional, PhpStorm, RubyMine, or WebStorm
- 4. For PhpStorm specifically, ensure build number 213.6461.83 or later
- 5. Install the fixed version and restart the IDE
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-45977 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-45977 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data