CVE-2021-46571
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Bentley View 10.16.0.80. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of JT files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-15365.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in Bentley View's JT file parser where the parser fails to validate object existence before performing operations on it. An attacker can exploit this by crafting a malicious JT file that, when opened by a user, allows arbitrary code execution in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.16.02<= 10.16.0.80< 10.16.02CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Bentley productCheck which Bentley application is installed: Bentley View, Bentley Microstation, or Bentley Microstation Connect. This can be verified through the Windows Programs and Features list, the application shortcut, or by launching the application and noting its name.Affected if The product is Bentley View, Bentley Microstation, or Bentley Microstation Connect.
-
Determine the installed version numberOpen the Bentley application and navigate to Help > About, or right-click the executable file and select Properties > Details to view the product version. Alternatively, check the version in the Windows Programs and Features list.Affected if The exact version number cannot be determined.
-
Compare version against affected rangesCompare your installed version to the following vulnerable ranges: Bentley Microstation versions below 10.16.02, Bentley Microstation Connect versions 10.16.0.80 or below, and Bentley View versions below 10.16.02.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: Microstation < 10.16.02, Microstation Connect <= 10.16.0.80, or View < 10.16.02.
-
Confirm JT file parsing is accessibleVerify that the application can open or process JT files. Attempt to open a JT file through File > Open or drag a JT file into the application. The vulnerability exists in the JT file parser component.Affected if JT files can be opened or processed by the application.
You are affected if you are running Bentley View, Microstation, or Microstation Connect at a version below 10.16.02 (or 10.16.0.80 or below for Connect edition) and the application can open JT files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.16.02
Do not open untrusted JT files until Bentley releases a patch. Apply vendor security updates as soon as available. Consider running Bentley View in restricted environments or sandboxes as a defense-in-depth measure.
Microstation: 10.16.02 or later | Microstation Connect: 10.16.0.80 or later (10.16.02 recommended) | View: 10.16.02 or later
- 1. Identify the installed Bentley product (Microstation, Microstation Connect, or View) and current version
- 2. Navigate to the Bentley software download portal or check for updates within the application
- 3. Download version 10.16.02 or later for Microstation and View products
- 4. For Microstation Connect, download version 10.16.0.80 or later (10.16.02 recommended)
- 5. Apply the update following standard Bentley installation procedures
- 6. Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-46571 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-46571 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data