CVE-2021-46744
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn attacker with access to a malicious hypervisor may be able to infer data values used in a SEV guest on AMD CPUs by monitoring ciphertext values over time.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAMD SEV (Secure Encrypted Virtualization) allows a malicious hypervisor to infer data values in a SEV-protected guest by observing ciphertext patterns over time. This ciphertext timing/side-channel attack exploits the fact that identical plaintexts produce identical ciphertexts, enabling inference of sensitive data being processed in the encrypted VM.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if AMD SEV is enabled for virtual machinesQuery the hypervisor or cloud provider to confirm SEV is in use. On KVM, check for 'sev' in the VM XML configuration (virsh dumpxml <vmname> | grep sev) or check /sys/kernel/security/sev for presence of SEV files. In cloud environments, verify the instance type supports and has SEV enabled.Affected if SEV is enabled and the hypervisor has the ability to observe ciphertext patterns over time
-
Confirm SEV-SNP (Secure Nested Paging) is NOT in useCheck the hypervisor or firmware documentation to determine if the SEV-SNP feature is active. On KVM, check kernel command line parameters or the SEV firmware capabilities. SEV-SNP provides protection that SEV alone lacks.Affected if The system uses SEV without SEV-SNP protection (SEV-SNP is not enumerated or enabled)
-
Identify the AMD Epyc processor model and firmware versionUse commands like 'dmidecode -t processor' to identify the CPU model, and check the system firmware/BIOS version. For cloud VMs, query the hypervisor for the underlying host CPU information. The affected models include Epyc 7001, 7002, 7003 series and specific models 7232p, 7251, 7252, 7261, 7262.Affected if The processor is an AMD Epyc 7001, 7002, or 7003 series, or specifically a 7232p, 7251, 7252, 7261, or 7262, with any firmware version, and SEV is enabled without SEV-SNP
A user is affected if they are running virtual machines with AMD SEV enabled (without SEV-SNP) on any of the listed AMD Epyc processor families, where the hypervisor could potentially observe ciphertext patterns over time to infer sensitive guest data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDeploy AMD SEV-SNP (Secure Nested Paging) which provides stronger hypervisor isolation, or ensure hypervisor integrity through measured boot and verified boot chains to prevent malicious hypervisor code execution.
Firmware/BIOS update from AMD motherboard/system vendor (contact AMD or your hardware vendor for specific version)
- Contact your motherboard or system manufacturer to obtain a firmware/BIOS update that addresses the SEV vulnerability
- Verify that the update includes the AMD SEV security patch
- After applying the firmware update, verify SEV is functioning correctly by checking the PSP firmware version through AMD's tools or system BIOS information
- Ensure your hypervisor is updated to a version compatible with the patched firmware
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-46744 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-46744 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data