CVE-2022-0292
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInappropriate implementation in Fenced Frames in Google Chrome prior to 97.0.4692.99 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability in Google Chrome's Fenced Frames feature (prior to 97.0.4692.99) allowed a remote attacker who had already compromised the renderer process to bypass navigation restrictions through a crafted HTML page. Fenced Frames are designed to isolate embedded content and prevent communication with the embedding page, but an implementation flaw permitted navigation restrictions to be circumvented.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 97.0.4692.99CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Google Chrome versionNavigate to chrome://settings/help or click Help > About Google Chrome to view the installed version numberAffected if The displayed version is lower than 97.0.4692.99 (for example, 96.x.x.x)
-
Verify Chrome update statusIn chrome://settings/help, check if an update is available or if the browser reports it is up to dateAffected if Chrome reports being up to date with a version below 97.0.4692.99, indicating the update has not been applied
You are affected if your Google Chrome version is less than 97.0.4692.99; the vulnerability is present in unpatched versions of Chrome 96 and earlier.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped97.0.4692.99
Update Google Chrome to version 97.0.4692.99 or later. Users should be advised to upgrade promptly, and organizations may consider automated update deployment.
Chrome 97.0.4692.99 or later (stable release)
- Open Google Chrome on your computer
- Click the three-dot menu icon in the top-right corner
- Select 'Help' from the dropdown menu
- Click 'About Google Chrome'
- Chrome will automatically check for updates and display the current version
- If an update is available, click 'Update Google Chrome'
- Restart Chrome to complete the installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-0292 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-0292 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data