Decision ManagerApplication · Redhat

CVE-2022-1415

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-09-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw was found where some utility classes in Drools core did not use proper safeguards when deserializing data. This flaw allows an authenticated attacker to construct malicious serialized objects (usually called gadgets) and achieve code execution on the server.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Drools core contains utility classes that fail to implement proper safeguards during Java deserialization, allowing authenticated attackers to inject malicious serialized gadget objects that execute arbitrary code on the server.

MitigationUpgrade Drools to a patched version; if immediate patching is unavailable, implement deserialization allow-listing or disable remote deserialization entirely.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Decision ManagerApplication
Affected:= 7.0
DroolsApplication
Affected:= 7.69.0
Jboss Middleware Text Only AdvisoriesApplication
Affected:all versions
Process AutomationApplication
Affected:= 7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate Drools installation
    Search for drools-core JAR files or check installation directories for Red Hat Decision Manager, Red Hat Drools, or Red Hat Process Automation. Common paths include /opt/drools, $JBOSS_HOME/modules, or application lib directories.
    Affected if Drools, Decision Manager, or Process Automation is installed on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Check the version of drools-core JAR, or for Red Hat products, examine the installed product version via RPM (rpm -qa | grep drools) or the product-specific version file in the installation directory.
    Affected if Version matches 7.0 (Decision Manager or Process Automation), 7.69.0 (Drools), or is an unpatched version of Red Hat JBoss Middleware
  3. Verify deserialization is accessible
    Examine configuration files (such as beans.xml, META-INF/beans.xml, or JBoss deployment descriptors) for deserialization-enabled endpoints. Check if JMX, RMI, or other remoting channels that allow Java object deserialization are exposed or enabled in the application's configuration.
    Affected if Remote deserialization or JMX deserialization is enabled and accessible to authenticated attackers
  4. Check for deserialization filters
    Inspect application and server configuration for javax.jms.ObjectMessage or Java deserialization filter settings. Look for any custom ObjectInputStream implementations or security constraints on deserialization pathways.
    Affected if No deserialization allow-listing or deny-listing filters are configured for deserialization endpoints

The environment is affected if a vulnerable Drools version (7.0, 7.69.0, or unpatched JBoss Middleware) is installed AND remote deserialization features are exposed or accessible without proper filtering.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Drools to a patched version; if immediate patching is unavailable, implement deserialization allow-listing or disable remote deserialization entirely.

Fix this in Decision Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-1415 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-1415 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data