CVE-2022-1665
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA set of pre-production kernel packages of Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM Power architecture can be booted by the grub in Secure Boot mode even though it shouldn't. These kernel builds don't have the secure boot lockdown patches applied to it and can bypass the secure boot validations, allowing the attacker to load another non-trusted code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePre-production RHEL kernel packages for IBM Power architecture can bypass Secure Boot validation because they lack secure boot lockdown patches. These vulnerable kernels can be booted by GRUB in Secure Boot mode when they shouldn't be, allowing attackers to load unsigned or malicious code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify system architectureRun 'uname -m' or check /proc/cpuinfo for 'ppc64le' to confirm IBM Power architectureAffected if System is NOT IBM Power (ppc64le) architecture - this CVE only affects IBM Power systems
-
Confirm RHEL versionCheck /etc/redhat-release or run 'cat /etc/os-release' to verify RHEL 8.0Affected if Running a version other than RHEL 8.0 - only RHEL 8.0 is listed as affected
-
Check Secure Boot statusRun 'mokutil --sb-state' or check firmware/UEFI settings to determine if Secure Boot is enabledAffected if Secure Boot is DISABLED - the vulnerability only applies when Secure Boot is active
-
Identify kernel package versionRun 'rpm -q kernel' to list installed kernel packages and check if they are pre-production or testing kernels (such as kernel-4.18.0-*.el8 or variants marked as pre-release)Affected if Kernel version is a pre-production/testing build lacking secure boot lockdown patches
-
Verify secure boot lockdown statusCheck /sys/kernel/security/lockdown/status or run 'cat /proc/cmdline' for 'lockdown=...' parameter to see if kernel lockdown is activeAffected if Kernel lockdown is NOT enforced - indicates missing secure boot lockdown patches
System is affected only if it is IBM Power architecture running RHEL 8.0 with Secure Boot enabled and a pre-production kernel lacking secure boot lockdown patches.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDeploy properly signed production kernels with secure boot lockdown patches applied, and update to the latest Red Hat kernel versions that include the fix.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 latest kernel update (including secure boot lockdown patches for IBM Power)
- 1. Ensure the system is registered with Red Hat Subscription Management or a Satellite server
- 2. Run 'yum update' or 'dnf update' to fetch the latest available kernel packages
- 3. The updated kernel packages will include the secure boot lockdown patches that were missing from the pre-production builds
- 4. After updating, reboot the system to load the new kernel
- 5. Verify Secure Boot is functioning correctly by checking the boot logs and ensuring the lockdown patches are active
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-1665 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-1665 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data