CVE-2022-20016
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn vow driver, there is a possible memory corruption due to improper locking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS05862986; Issue ID: ALPS05862986.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in the MediaTek VOW (Voice Wake-up) driver allows memory corruption due to improper locking mechanisms. This driver-level flaw enables a local attacker to escalate privileges to System level without user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.0= 11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Android versionRun 'getprop ro.build.version.release' or check Settings > About Phone > Android versionAffected if The version shown is exactly 10.0 or 11.0 (not 10.0.x or 11.0.x variants, and not other versions)
-
Identify chipset vendorRun 'getprop ro.hardware' or check /proc/cpuinfo for MediaTek identifiersAffected if The device uses a MediaTek chipset (VOW driver is MediaTek-specific)
-
Verify VOW driver presenceCheck /sys/class/misc/ or /dev/ for vow-related entries, or run 'lsmod | grep vow' if modules are accessibleAffected if The MediaTek VOW (voice wake-up) driver is present and loaded on the device
A device is affected if it runs Android 10.0 or 11.0, uses a MediaTek chipset, and has the VOW driver present; the vulnerability cannot be triggered on non-MediaTek devices or Android versions outside the affected range.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patch ALPS05862986 which corrects the improper locking in the VOW driver; this is a firmware/driver-level update requiring deployment to affected devices.
Latest Android 10/11 security patch level (refer to MediaTek security bulletin and device OEM release)
- 1. Check your device manufacturer's security update bulletin for the month containing the CVE-2022-20016 fix
- 2. Ensure your Android device is running the latest available security patch level for Android 10 or 11
- 3. Go to Settings > Security > Security update and verify you have the latest patch installed
- 4. If no update is available, contact your device manufacturer or carrier for ETA on the security patch
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20016 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20016 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data